Justice's Handling of Alleged Disclosure/Retaliation

OSI-96-7R: Published: Sep 6, 1996. Publicly Released: Nov 12, 1996.

Additional Materials:

Contact:

Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800
youngc1@gao.gov

Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed allegations concerning retaliation against a complainant who reported the unauthorized disclosure of a Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) confidential informant to the appropriate Department of Justice (DOJ) officials. GAO noted that: (1) it could not substantiate that any DOJ employee had disclosed the informant's identity or had acted improperly during the investigations of the alleged leak and alleged retaliation; (2) defense attorneys in the case had concluded that there was a FBI informant from documents disclosed during the discovery process; (3) an audit of the complainant's travel vouchers was initiated because of a duplicate travel reimbursement to the complainant; (4) there was no evidence that the audit constituted a retaliatory act; (5) DOJ made changes to the complainant's performance appraisal in response to his complaints that it contained derogatory comments; and (6) the DOJ Offices of Special Counsel, Professional Responsibility, and Inspector General found no evidence of the alleged leak or retaliation during their investigations and believed that the travel audit was justified.

May 23, 2016

May 17, 2016

May 9, 2016

Apr 26, 2016

Apr 5, 2016

Feb 22, 2016

Feb 11, 2016

Feb 1, 2016

Dec 16, 2015

Dec 2, 2015

Looking for more? Browse all our products here