Justice's Handling of Alleged Disclosure/Retaliation

OSI-96-7R: Published: Sep 6, 1996. Publicly Released: Nov 12, 1996.

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed allegations concerning retaliation against a complainant who reported the unauthorized disclosure of a Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) confidential informant to the appropriate Department of Justice (DOJ) officials. GAO noted that: (1) it could not substantiate that any DOJ employee had disclosed the informant's identity or had acted improperly during the investigations of the alleged leak and alleged retaliation; (2) defense attorneys in the case had concluded that there was a FBI informant from documents disclosed during the discovery process; (3) an audit of the complainant's travel vouchers was initiated because of a duplicate travel reimbursement to the complainant; (4) there was no evidence that the audit constituted a retaliatory act; (5) DOJ made changes to the complainant's performance appraisal in response to his complaints that it contained derogatory comments; and (6) the DOJ Offices of Special Counsel, Professional Responsibility, and Inspector General found no evidence of the alleged leak or retaliation during their investigations and believed that the travel audit was justified.

Nov 12, 2015

Nov 10, 2015

Nov 4, 2015

Oct 21, 2015

Sep 23, 2015

Sep 15, 2015

Jun 29, 2015

Jun 19, 2015

May 28, 2015

Apr 29, 2015

Looking for more? Browse all our products here