Defense Depot Maintenance:
Contracting Approaches Should Address Workload Characteristics
NSIAD-98-130: Published: Jun 15, 1998. Publicly Released: Jun 15, 1998.
- Full Report:
Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed how the Department of Defense (DOD) manages contracting for depot maintenance, focusing on the: (1) characteristics of that contracting; and (2) implications of those characteristics for future depot maintenance contract management processes and procedures.
GAO noted that: (1) DOD is attempting to rely more on competitive market forces to assure quality products at fair prices; (2) consistent with recent declines in the defense budget, resources for administering and auditing contracts have been cut significantly, with DOD reducing its total acquisition workforce at all levels; (3) from fiscal year (FY) 1993 to July 1997, the Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) and the Defense Contract Management Command (DCMC) reduced their personnel levels by more than 18 and 24 percent, respectively, and further reductions are planned; (4) in making these reductions, both organizations are reengineering their processes; (5) they are attempting to rely more on competitive market forces and contractor internal processes and controls to assure quality products at fair prices, but it is uncertain whether these processes and conditions will function as expected; (6) at present, depot maintenance contracting represents a challenge to relying on commercial market forces; (7) about 91 percent of the depot maintenance contracts GAO reviewed were awarded noncompetitively, mostly to original equipment manufacturers that own the data rights; (8) other factors, including difficulties in precisely defining requirements, also impact efforts to rely on competitive market forces; (9) as DOD continues transitioning from its traditional contract management and oversight structure, it will need to increase the use of competitively awarded depot maintenance contracts; (10) to the extent that competition for some maintenance workloads is not possible or practicable, DOD will need to address how best to assure product quality and reasonable prices when competitive market forces are not present; (11) DOD has developed a logistics strategic plan that lays out specific objectives and strategies for improving DOD's logistics activities; (12) however, the plan does not address the depot maintenance issues raised in this report; (13) GAO has previously recommended that the Secretary of Defense require the development of a detailed implementation plan for improving the efficiency and effectiveness of DOD's logistics activities to include depot maintenance; and (14) the challenges that DOD faces in successfully relying on competitive market forces for depot maintenance require management attention and actions to address the unique characteristics of DOD's depot maintenance activities and assure that expected savings can be achieved.
Recommendation for Executive Action
Status: Closed - Implemented
Comments: On April 8, 1999, the DOD IG closed action on this recommendation. The IG determined that it was not practical to keep the recommendation open based on a March 26, 1999 letter from the Assistant Deputy Under Secretary of Defense (Maintenance Policy, Programs and Resources) that OSD was taking a new approach to development of its annual logistics strategic plan. The new approach began with the service Deputy Chiefs of Staff for Logistics outlining a top-down strategic plan to serve as the baseline for future plans. Follow-on meetings would be used to finalize the plan. Originally, OSD chartered an integrated product team to develop implementation planning for the maintenance-related portions of its 1998 logistics strategic plan. However, the team was terminated without coming to an agreement on a final product because of personnel changes at the Deputy under Secretary of Defense (Logistics) level.
Recommendation: The Secretary of Defense should require the development of a detailed implementation plan to guide future management improvement efforts to increase the cost-effectiveness of DOD's depot maintenance program, including issues related to improving the management and cost-effectiveness of contract depot maintenance workloads.
Agency Affected: Department of Defense