Army Force Structure:

Current System for Assigning Troops to Europe Has Advantages Over Alternatives

NSIAD-94-42: Published: Nov 10, 1993. Publicly Released: Nov 17, 1993.

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed the feasibility of rotating Army personnel to Europe to replace the forces stationed there, focusing on the relative merits of: (1) adopting the system of rotating personnel without their dependents; (2) introducing a unit rotation system without dependents; (3) rotating units without dependents for short-term training tours; and (4) continuing the current system of rotating personnel with their dependents.

GAO found that: (1) instituting an unaccompanied, individual replacement rotation system would enable the Army to close some dependent-related facilities, but offsetting costs would reduce savings; (2) unit rotations could only be instituted on a limited scale; (3) intermittent training rotations are costly and present considerable logistical difficulties; (4) the current system of rotating personnel is the most advantageous in terms of readiness and morale; and (5) substantial financial savings are possible if consolidations and improved efficiency of operations continue.

Nov 22, 2017

Oct 31, 2017

Oct 27, 2017

Oct 26, 2017

Oct 16, 2017

Oct 10, 2017

Oct 5, 2017

Sep 29, 2017

Sep 28, 2017

Looking for more? Browse all our products here