NASA Procurement:

Improving Oversight of Construction Projects at the Langley Research Center

NSIAD-92-230: Published: Jul 9, 1992. Publicly Released: Jul 9, 1992.

Contact:

Donna M. Heivilin
(202) 512-8430
contact@gao.gov

 

Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800
youngc1@gao.gov

Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed the National Aeronautics and Space Administration's (NASA) construction contracting practices under one contract, focusing on concerns about the contractor's: (1) authorization to perform under non-competitive work orders; (2) hiring of unneeded additional employees; (3) inspection and approval of its own work; (4) poor work and inefficiency; and (5) failure to subcontract with small businesses.

GAO found that: (1) the contract required the use of work orders; (2) the contract authorized the contractor to hire employees to perform the contracted work; (3) the contractor was required to inspect its own construction work, but NASA did not have records showing that all required inspections were performed; (4) NASA plans to move the inspection function to a separate contract due to the potential conflict of interest; (5) NASA construction and evaluation inspections are not adequate support for award fee determinations; (6) NASA does not evaluate the firm's cost efficiency; and (7) the contractor did not have written representations for all subcontracts awarded to small businesses, but all of the subcontractors identified themselves as small businesses.

Status Legend:

More Info
  • Review Pending-GAO has not yet assessed implementation status.
  • Open-Actions to satisfy the intent of the recommendation have not been taken or are being planned, or actions that partially satisfy the intent of the recommendation have been taken.
  • Closed-implemented-Actions that satisfy the intent of the recommendation have been taken.
  • Closed-not implemented-While the intent of the recommendation has not been satisfied, time or circumstances have rendered the recommendation invalid.
    • Review Pending
    • Open
    • Closed - implemented
    • Closed - not implemented

    Recommendations for Executive Action

    Recommendation: To improve the monitoring, evaluating, and documenting of contractor performance, the Administrator, NASA, should ensure that Langley officials implement the planned corrective actions discussed in this report.

    Agency Affected: National Aeronautics and Space Administration

    Status: Closed - Implemented

    Comments: Langley completed implementation of the planned corrective actions to improve the monitoring, evaluation, and documentation of contractor performance, including the transfer of the construction project inspection to an independent contractor.

    Recommendation: The Administrator, NASA, should require the other field centers to review their procedures for monitoring, evaluating, and documenting contractors' construction activities under similar contracts and, if found deficient, take corrective actions.

    Agency Affected: National Aeronautics and Space Administration

    Status: Closed - Implemented

    Comments: Centers' reviews of their oversight procedures for task order construction contracts have been completed. The reviews indicated that adequate construction contracting safeguards are in place and no additional corrective measures are required.

    Jul 23, 2014

    Jul 16, 2014

    Jun 20, 2014

    May 15, 2014

    May 8, 2014

    Apr 15, 2014

    Mar 12, 2014

    Feb 4, 2014

    Jan 13, 2014

    Jan 8, 2014

    Looking for more? Browse all our products here