Soviet Energy:

U.S. Attempts to Aid Oil Production Are Hindered by Many Obstacles

NSIAD-91-214: Published: May 24, 1991. Publicly Released: Jun 19, 1991.

Additional Materials:

Contact:

Allan I. Mendelowitz
(202) 275-4812
contact@gao.gov

 

Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800
youngc1@gao.gov

Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO provided information on the: (1) decline in Soviet oil production and the reasons for that decline; and (2) principal obstacles to U.S. trade and investment in Soviet oil exploration and production.

GAO found that: (1) since 1988, Soviet oil production declined by about 8.8 percent; (2) from 1988 through 1990, oil exports declined about 15 percent; (3) production and export declines were due to a lack of sufficient exploration and production capital and the Soviet Union's use of outdated and inefficient production practices; (4) Soviet officials believed that U.S. oil companies could assist in reversing the oil production decline by participating in more U.S.-Soviet joint ventures; (5) the Soviet Union's political uncertainty and lack of western business knowledge constrained oil trade and investment; (6) the absence of a bilateral tax treaty allowing U.S. companies to repatriate joint-venture profits without double taxation hindered efforts to promote investment in Soviet oil production; (7) despite those difficulties, several U.S. multinational oil companies signed or were considering joint-venture agreements; (8) the federal government, private companies, and universities developed some training programs on western business practices; and (9) the U.S. and Soviet governments were currently negotiating a tax treaty.

Matter for Congressional Consideration

  1. Status: Closed - Implemented

    Comments: Congress passed H.J. Resolution 456 on April 1, 1992, and the President signed it the same day (P.L. 102-266), which repealed the Stevenson and Byrd Amendments.

    Matter: In light of the changes in the Soviet Union since 1974, when the Stevenson and Byrd amendments were adopted, Congress may wish to reconsider the continued need for those amendments. A decision to remove the legislative restrictions would not necessarily mean immediate U.S. loans and guarantees to the Soviet energy sector. The U.S. Export-Import Bank would still be expected to apply its standard procedures for assessing the risk of nonrepayment of loans, including country risk analysis, in determining whether loans and guarantees should be extended to the Soviet Union.

 

Explore the full database of GAO's Open Recommendations »

Sep 22, 2016

Sep 20, 2016

Sep 7, 2016

Aug 31, 2016

Aug 25, 2016

Aug 15, 2016

Jul 14, 2016

Jul 6, 2016

Looking for more? Browse all our products here