Army Training:

Need to Improve Assessments of Land Requirements and Priorities

NSIAD-90-44BR: Published: Dec 1, 1989. Publicly Released: Dec 5, 1989.

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO examined the Army's overall training land acquisition plans and procedures, focusing on: (1) the extent to which the Commission on Base Realignment and Closure's work affected the Army's acquisition plans; and (2) whether a failure to expand Ft. Riley would make it vulnerable to closing as part of any future base-closing efforts.

GAO found that: (1) the Army did not follow established land acquisition procedures or have a basis for determining relative training land needs among installations; (2) individual commanders initiated most of the land acquisitions for specific installations, rather than considering Army installations' collective needs; (3) although the Army was making changes to its outdated training land acquisition process, it had not established a completion date and had conflicting information on the planned acquisitions at Ft. Riley; (4) Army requirements for alternatives to land acquisition early in the process did not precede preliminary land requirement decisions and was usually done at the installation level under limited decisionmaking authority; (5) although the Commission indicated that the Army needed additional land at 13 installations to satisfy its requirements, the Commission did not suggest closing Ft. Riley; and (6) the potential impact of uncertain future force reductions was unclear.

Nov 2, 2017

Oct 31, 2017

Oct 27, 2017

Oct 26, 2017

Oct 16, 2017

Oct 10, 2017

Oct 5, 2017

Sep 29, 2017

Sep 28, 2017

Looking for more? Browse all our products here