Army Procurement:

Costs and Benefits of Electronic and Mechanical Time Fuzes

NSIAD-90-38: Published: Dec 22, 1989. Publicly Released: Jan 23, 1990.

Additional Materials:

Contact:

Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800
youngc1@gao.gov

Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed the costs and benefits of the Army's M762 electronic time fuze and M557 mechanical time fuze.

GAO found that: (1) both fuzes were capable of satisfying the Army's artillery time fuze requirements; (2) the electronic time fuze could be set both manually and automatically and could be set manually without the use of a tool, but its autoset capability could not be utilized because current artillery systems did not use autoset fuzes; (3) the mechanical fuze was economical, safe, and reliable, and current manufacturers could produce them in higher quantities than the Army's stated annual requirements; (4) during the first 3 years of production, the M762 fuze would cost more than the M577 fuze; and (5) the Army's stated requirements for artillery time fuzes for fiscal year (FY) 1990 could be met with mechanical fuzes for considerably less than the $54.9 million included in its FY 1990 budget request for the procurement of electronic fuzes.

Sep 22, 2016

Sep 21, 2016

Sep 19, 2016

Sep 12, 2016

Sep 8, 2016

Sep 7, 2016

Sep 6, 2016

Aug 25, 2016

Looking for more? Browse all our products here