Army Procurement:

Allegations of Unfair Treatment at Fort Lee, Virginia, Found to Be Unmerited

NSIAD-89-46: Published: Dec 6, 1988. Publicly Released: Dec 6, 1988.

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

In response to a congressional request, GAO reviewed a complaint from a firm concerning alleged unfair procurement practices at Fort Lee, Virginia, to determine whether the: (1) contracting personnel acted properly in not selecting for cost comparison the bid with the lowest proposed cost; and (2) Army consistently applied Office of Management and Budget (OMB) requirements and federal procurement regulations in its selection process.

GAO found that the Army: (1) evenly applied the same criteria to all bids; and (2) properly did not select the complainant's bid for cost comparison with the government's in-house estimate, since the bid was unrealistically low and it did not have high management and technical ratings. GAO also found that: (1) although the Army properly modified the solicitation to correct ambiguous instructions and allowed bidders to correct their bids, the complainant's bid needed no corrections; and (2) the Army's bid evaluation was flawed, since it gave too much weight to cost, did not conform to the original evaluation criteria and, under a cost-reimbursement contract, could have resulted in possible cost overruns. In addition, GAO found that the Army took corrective action to reevaluate the bids using a selection plan that fully conformed with the solicitation criteria.

Oct 16, 2017

Oct 5, 2017

Sep 29, 2017

Sep 28, 2017

Sep 27, 2017

Sep 26, 2017

Sep 19, 2017

Sep 12, 2017

Looking for more? Browse all our products here