Strategic Forces:

Justification for the Short Range Attack Missile II

NSIAD-88-81BR: Published: Dec 31, 1987. Publicly Released: Jan 12, 1988.

Additional Materials:

Contact:

Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800
youngc1@gao.gov

Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed the: (1) Air Force's justifications for replacing its Short Range Attack Missile (SRAM) A with SRAM II; (2) Department of Defense's (DOD) SRAM II reports to Congress; and (3) potential impact of a 4- to 5-year SRAM II program delay.

GAO found that the Air Force justified the SRAM replacement based on: (1) declining inventory; (2) effects of aging on effectiveness and safety; (3) current nuclear safety design criteria; and (4) improved enemy defenses and changed target characteristics. GAO also found that DOD reports to Congress: (1) analyzed the least costly SRAM II design; (2) compared the cost-effectiveness of SRAM II with two SRAM A modification options; and (3) concluded that SRAM II was the most cost-effective alternative which met minimum requirements. In addition, GAO found that delay of the SRAM II program could: (1) compound current SRAM A problems; (2) require a new design effort and competition; (3) reduce the effectiveness of the penetrating bomber force and increase the bomber's exposure to enemy defenses; and (4) increase costs to the government. GAO noted that: (1) SRAM II could benefit from possible technological breakthroughs made during the delay period; and (2) an extended delay could help to reduce current budget reduction pressures.

Nov 22, 2017

Oct 31, 2017

Oct 27, 2017

Oct 26, 2017

Oct 16, 2017

Oct 10, 2017

Oct 5, 2017

Sep 29, 2017

Sep 28, 2017

Looking for more? Browse all our products here