Quality and Safety Problems With the Beretta M9 Handgun

NSIAD-88-213: Published: Sep 15, 1988. Publicly Released: Sep 15, 1988.

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

In response to a congressional request, GAO reviewed the Army's M9 handgun program, specifically: (1) quality and safety problems; (2) an alleged Army cover up of the quality and safety problems; (3) differences between M9 the Army tested in 1984 and the current M9; and (4) efforts to conduct recompetition tests for awarding a follow-on contract for additional handguns.

GAO found that the: (1) Army experienced quality and safety problems with M9 but did not attempt to cover up the problems; (2) Army rejected the production lots of the handguns due to frame crack problems, and issued a safety message to all M9 users; (3) Army determined that fatigue cracks caused the slides to fail, and was attempting to determine what caused the cracks; and (4) contractor implemented engineering changes which resolved the frame crack problems. GAO also found that: (1) an independent testing laboratory found that the configuration changes to the handgun made it easier for the manufacturer to comply with contract specifications; and (2) the Army included M9 in recompetition testing, which began in mid-August 1988, and expects to award a contract in May 1989.

Sep 30, 2016

Sep 29, 2016

Sep 28, 2016

Sep 27, 2016

Sep 26, 2016

Sep 23, 2016

Sep 21, 2016

Sep 7, 2016

Aug 30, 2016

Looking for more? Browse all our products here