Navy Management and Use of the Selective Reenlistment Bonus Program

NSIAD-85-143: Published: Sep 9, 1985. Publicly Released: Sep 9, 1985.

Additional Materials:

Contact:

Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800
youngc1@gao.gov

Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed the Navy's Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) Program to determine whether: (1) the program was well managed; (2) bonuses were awarded on the basis of a larger enlisted force than annually authorized by Congress; (3) bonuses were being paid for occupations that were overstaffed; and (4) the current method of paying half of the bonus in a lump sum is the most cost-efficient approach for the government.

GAO found that: (1) the SRB program was well managed; (2) the Navy's projections of future manpower needs were accurate; (3) the Navy based its annual award level plan on projected future personnel needs; (4) using projections of future manpower needs is necessary to retain the increased number of experienced personnel; and (5) the Navy paid bonuses to people who reenlisted in occupational specialties that were over 100-percent staffed, but the future manpower needs of the specialty were significantly understaffed. GAO also found that: (1) lump-sum bonuses are more cost-efficient than bonuses paid in installments on a dollar-for-dollar basis; (2) a return to the lump-sum method of paying bonuses could result in significant SRB program savings; and (3) the payment of bonuses can be a less expensive way to meet manpower requirements when recruiting and training costs are high.

Sep 22, 2016

Sep 21, 2016

Sep 19, 2016

Sep 12, 2016

Sep 8, 2016

Sep 7, 2016

Sep 6, 2016

Aug 25, 2016

Looking for more? Browse all our products here