Commercial Versus Government Storage

LCD-76-241: Published: Oct 18, 1976. Publicly Released: Oct 18, 1976.

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

Protests by the Department of Defense (DOD) of the use of government warehouses rather than commercial storage for the storage of household goods are discussed. A potential saving of $576,956 by using unused government-owned facilities at Kelly Air Force Base, Texas, was proposed.

A one-time saving of over $14 million and an annual saving of $700,000 is now indicated by DOD; however, if the space could be used in a way that would result in greater savings, GAO would support the alternative use. At the Oakland Army Terminal, DOD took exception to four cost elements: (1) storage in transit; (2) packing and draying; (3) opportunity costs; and (4) self-insured liability. DOD alleged that storage in transit costs would be incurred under both government and commercial storage and should be included in computations; these costs were included in computations under both alternatives. DOD believes that packing and draying costs would be incurred by conversion to a government storage operation; it is felt that such costs would be the same regardless of the facilities used.

Oct 20, 2017

Oct 2, 2017

  • auditing icon, source: PhotoDisc

    U.S. Territories:

    Public Debt Outlook
    GAO-18-160: Published: Oct 2, 2017. Publicly Released: Oct 2, 2017.

Sep 26, 2017

Jul 13, 2017

Jul 12, 2017

Jun 30, 2017

Jun 29, 2017

Jun 14, 2017

Jun 13, 2017

Looking for more? Browse all our products here