Veterans Benefits:
Acquisition of Information Resources for Modernization Is Premature
IMTEC-93-6, Nov 4, 1992
Contact:
(202) 512-6253
contact@gao.gov
Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800
youngc1@gao.gov
Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed the Veterans Benefits Administration's (VBA) information systems modernization effort, focusing on whether VBA: (1) will reflect its commitment to migrate to an open systems environment in its modernized system; and (2) procurements in support of the modernization effort duplicated other departmental procurements.
GAO found that VBA: (1) has not sufficiently analyzed its business processes to determine how information technology can best be used to modernize its operations and improve service to veterans; (2) lacked detailed information on the specific activities used to deliver benefits to veterans; (3) has not established specific service goals or performance indicators to measure modernization efforts; (4) planned to buy information technology components without first defining its new information architecture; (5) did not have an organization-wide process to involve all program and information resources management (IRM) office senior managers in its modernization effort; (6) lacked effective communication and cooperation between its program and IRM offices; and (7) chief information resources officer (CIRO) lacked the authority to resolve problems and had no active role in ensuring that VBA-proposed acquisitions would deliver improved service.
Status Legend:
- Review Pending
- Open
- Closed - implemented
- Closed - not implemented
Recommendations for Executive Action
Recommendation: To ensure that the modernization effort successfully delivers improved service to the nation's veterans, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs (VA) should postpone contract award for any procurements under the modernization effort until VBA: (1) analyzes its current business processes and develops a clear understanding of the deficiencies and problems the effort is intended to resolve; (2) identifies specific goals for improved service and develops a formal process to ensure that the modernization system meets those goals; (3) completely defines its new information architecture; and (4) ensures effective participation and communication between senior program and IRM managers
Agency Affected: Department of Veterans Affairs
Status: Closed - Not Implemented
Comments: In a letter dated March 24, 1993, VA stated that it did not concur with GAO's recommendation and therefore would not cancel its procurement for Stage I because the existing Benefits Delivery Network employed obsolete computing techniques and outdated software functions. Also, at that time, VBA stated that serious equipment failures were occurring which would adversely affect VBA's ability to provide adequate and timely service to veterans. As a result, the Department closed this recommendation (case IG-1820)and planned no followup. After several years of monitoring this, GAO is closing the recommendation and will keep updated on this area on a current congressionally requested assignment.
Recommendation: To ensure that the modernization effort successfully delivers improved service to the nation's veterans, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs should ensure that the chief information resources officer has authority for defining, designing, and implementing the modernization effort. This should include authority and responsibility for leading the analysis of the current benefits delivery processes, establishing service delivery goals, and developing plans for how information technology should be used to provide better service to veterans.
Agency Affected: Department of Veterans Affairs
Status: Closed - Implemented
Comments: In June 1993, VA agreed to redirect one of its largest IRM projects at BVA. As part of the redirection, VA stated that CIRO oversight would be strengthened for all major projects. VA stated specifically that the CIRO would develop and use criteria to prioritize, approve, and evaluate major IRM projects. The date for completing this effort is unknown since implementation of the agreement is in the planning stages. In July 1994, GAO updated VA's progress to implement its June 1993 agreement with OMB. GAO found that the CIRO: (1) has not established new criteria to prioritize, approve, and evaluate major IRM projects; and (2) is not leading the analysis of business processes and establishing service delivery goals. Although the current and past Secretaries have repeatedly agreed to take steps to strengthen CIRO oversight over IRM projects, VA's actions have not substantially changed or improved the CIRO role. Therefore, GAO believes this recommendation should be closed.
May 9, 2013
Federal Reserve Banks
Apr 4, 2013
Information Sharing
Mar 27, 2013
Information Sharing
Feb 27, 2013
Electronic Health Records
Feb 21, 2013
Human Services
Dec 14, 2012
Inmate Reentry Programs
Nov 19, 2012
Information Management
Aug 30, 2012
Freedom of Information Act
Jul 31, 2012
Privacy
Jul 26, 2012
Electronic Health Records
Looking for more? Browse all our products here







