Space Communications:

Better Understanding of Scheduling System Limitations Needed

IMTEC-91-48: Published: Sep 17, 1991. Publicly Released: Sep 20, 1991.

Contact:

Samuel W. Bowlin
(202) 512-6240
contact@gao.gov

 

Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800
youngc1@gao.gov

Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed the efficiency and effectiveness of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration's (NASA) system for scheduling usage of the Tracking and Data Relay Satellite System (TDRSS).

GAO found that: (1) since scheduling TDRSS usage is a complicated process, spacecraft project users generate a tentative schedule of the precise contact times and types of TDRSS services needed 3 weeks before service is required; (2) conflicts between users for the same service at the same time are resolved by changing the requested start time, changing the type of service requested, or switching the service requested to a different TDRSS satellite or antenna; (3) the Hubble Space Telescope and the space shuttle are the two biggest sources of schedule disruption; (4) inadequate automated tools have made the conflict resolution process more tedious, labor-intensive, and potentially error-prone than necessary; (5) TDRSS users are concerned that the scheduling system may be inadequate to handle the expected increase in demand for communications services; (6) although TDRSS has been generally very reliable in providing service when needed, TDRSS failure to support user missions could have serious economic and scientific ramifications; (7) developing an efficient scheduling system to accommodate future growth would require an entirely new system design which has been planned but will not be available until fiscal year 1997 at the earliest; and (8) NASA is reluctant to implement enhancements that may streamline the conflict resolution process, because its data were not comprehensive enough to accurately predict the impact of additional TDRSS users on the scheduling process.

Status Legend:

More Info
  • Review Pending-GAO has not yet assessed implementation status.
  • Open-Actions to satisfy the intent of the recommendation have not been taken or are being planned, or actions that partially satisfy the intent of the recommendation have been taken.
  • Closed-implemented-Actions that satisfy the intent of the recommendation have been taken.
  • Closed-not implemented-While the intent of the recommendation has not been satisfied, time or circumstances have rendered the recommendation invalid.
    • Review Pending
    • Open
    • Closed - implemented
    • Closed - not implemented

    Recommendations for Executive Action

    Recommendation: The Administrator, NASA, should assess the ability of the current scheduling system to accommodate the additional TDRSS users expected in the near future. Basic measurements to support this assessment would likely include the volume of user requests that are received and rejected at all points in the scheduling process, the number of those requests that must be altered and resubmitted, and the time it takes to reach final resolution of conflicts.

    Agency Affected: National Aeronautics and Space Administration

    Status: Closed - Implemented

    Comments: NASA has collected the data it needs to assess scheduling system limitations.

    Recommendation: The Administrator, NASA, should use the results of the assessment of the current scheduling system to reevaluate its decision not to implement software enhancements that have been identified by scheduling operations personnel as critical to improving productivity.

    Agency Affected: National Aeronautics and Space Administration

    Status: Closed - Implemented

    Comments: The assessment to reevaluate software enhancements showed no additional software changes are needed.

    Jul 23, 2014

    Jul 16, 2014

    Jun 20, 2014

    May 15, 2014

    May 8, 2014

    Apr 15, 2014

    Mar 12, 2014

    Feb 4, 2014

    Jan 13, 2014

    Jan 8, 2014

    Looking for more? Browse all our products here