Skip to main content

Department of Education Grant Award

HRD-93-8R Published: Dec 09, 1992. Publicly Released: Dec 09, 1992.
Jump To:
Skip to Highlights

Highlights

Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed the procedures the Department of Education Office of Educational Research and Improvement (OERI) used in awarding a discretionary grant to demonstrate the use of high technology to address education needs in critical subject areas. GAO noted that: (1) the peer review process was poorly managed; (2) grant proposal priorities were broad and allowed vague applications; (3) reviewer comments on the highest ranked proposal were lost; (4) delays in providing support for a mid-process decision and recreating the lost review comments may have stopped completion of an approved award; (5) OERI actions created the erroneous impression that a new proposal was being recommended for funding; and (6) the Assistant Secretary acted within her authority in recommending the winning proposal for the grant.

Full Report

Office of Public Affairs

Topics

Discretionary grantsEducational grantsEvaluation criteriaGrant administrationGrant award proceduresInternal controlsTechnical proposal evaluationGrant awardGrant competitionSchools