Elder Abuse:

Effectiveness of Reporting Laws and Other Factors

HRD-91-74: Published: Apr 24, 1991. Publicly Released: May 16, 1991.

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed states' mandatory and voluntary laws for reporting domestic elder abuse, to determine: (1) which type of law was most effective in identifying elder abuse victims; and (2) the effectiveness of reporting laws and other factors in identifying, preventing, and treating elderly abuse.

GAO found that: (1) significant differences among states' laws and data collection practices made it difficult to compare mandatory and voluntary laws and to determine which type of reporting law was more effective; (2) 80 percent of state officials ranked public and professional awareness as the most effective factor for identifying elder abuse victims; (3) 26 state officials ranked the provision of in-home services as one of the most effective factors for preventing and treating elder abuse; (4) reporting laws, whether mandatory or voluntary, were considered less effective for preventing a first occurrence of elder abuse or treating substantiated cases; (5) 18 state officials ranked interagency coordination as the second most effective factor for treating elder abuse and in-home respite care as the third most effective factor for treating elder abuse; and (6) efforts to raise public and professional awareness, improve interagency coordination, and increase the availability of in-home and respite care are likely to have a more significant impact on the effectiveness of state elder abuse programs than mandatory or voluntary reporting laws.

Sep 21, 2016

Aug 3, 2016

Aug 1, 2016

Jul 14, 2016

Jul 5, 2016

Jun 30, 2016

Jun 28, 2016

Jun 23, 2016

Jun 22, 2016

Looking for more? Browse all our products here