Science and Technology:

Minimum Requirements Are Needed for Colleges and Universities To Justify Research Equipment Purchases

HRD-78-52: Published: May 11, 1978. Publicly Released: May 11, 1978.


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

The National Science Foundation (NSF) and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) provide about 65 percent of the federal grant funds awarded to colleges and universities to conduct scientific research and appear to be the primary sources of grant funds for research equipment. The NSF budget for equipment increased about 50 percent since fiscal year 1976, and NIH expenditures for equipment rose about 25 percent between 1976 and 1977. During this period, equipment expenses rose from 11 percent to 13 percent of total grant expenses for NSF and from 5.3 percent to 5.6 percent for NIH.

Both NSF and NIH rely mainly on the researcher to request only necessary equipment. The agencies also use their research proposal evaluation system, including peer review, budget cuts, and site visits to help eliminate unnecessary equipment requests. Both agencies expect the researcher and/or the department head to determine equipment availability in the department before requesting new equipment. Officials at six of seven universities reviewed said they rely heavily on the researchers' personal knowledge of available equipment when determining the need for new equipment. NSF and NIH both required institutions to maintain property records and periodically conduct physical inventories. Had these requirements been complied with, they could have helped institution officials determine equipment needs. According to Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-110 issued in 1976, grantees are no longer required to maintain inventory or other controls over equipment.

Status Legend:

More Info
  • Review Pending-GAO has not yet assessed implementation status.
  • Open-Actions to satisfy the intent of the recommendation have not been taken or are being planned, or actions that partially satisfy the intent of the recommendation have been taken.
  • Closed-implemented-Actions that satisfy the intent of the recommendation have been taken.
  • Closed-not implemented-While the intent of the recommendation has not been satisfied, time or circumstances have rendered the recommendation invalid.
    • Review Pending
    • Open
    • Closed - implemented
    • Closed - not implemented

    Recommendation for Executive Action

    Recommendation: The Director, OMB, in conjunction with federal agencies awarding research grants to nonprofit institutions, should develop for inclusion in OMB Circular A-110: (1) minimum requirements for grantees to follow to avoid unnecessary equipment purchases; and (2) procedures to periodically check grantees' compliance with these requirements.

    Agency Affected:

    Status: Closed

    Comments: Please call 202/512-6100 for additional information.

    Jul 23, 2014

    Jun 9, 2014

    May 20, 2014

    • science icon, source: National Cancer Institute

      Nanomanufacturing and U.S. Competitiveness:

      Challenges and Opportunities
      GAO-14-618T: Published: May 20, 2014. Publicly Released: May 20, 2014.

    Feb 7, 2014

    Dec 20, 2013

    Nov 4, 2013

    • science icon, source: National Cancer Institute

      Small Business Innovation Research:

      Data Rights Protections
      GAO-14-116R: Published: Nov 4, 2013. Publicly Released: Nov 4, 2013.

    Jul 19, 2013

    Apr 10, 2013

    Feb 15, 2013

    Jun 20, 2012

    Looking for more? Browse all our products here