Welfare Reform:

Three States' Approaches Show Promise of Increasing Work Participation

HEHS-97-80: Published: May 30, 1997. Publicly Released: May 30, 1997.

Additional Materials:

Contact:

Jane L. Ross
(202) 512-3000
contact@gao.gov

 

Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800
youngc1@gao.gov

Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed states' experiences under waivers with increasing the participation of welfare recipients in work and work-related activities, focusing on: (1) the policies and programs states initiated under waivers to increase participation in work and work-related activities; and (2) whether states with statewide waivers achieved participation rates comparable to those specified by the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act.

GAO noted that: (1) the three states GAO reviewed, Massachusetts, Michigan, and Utah, initiated policy changes designed to increase the proportion of welfare recipients participating in activities intended to move them toward self-sufficiency; (2) the three states changed their requirements regarding who must participate and what constitutes participation; (3) Michigan and Utah eliminated prior exemptions, thereby requiring all recipients to participate in some activity, while Massachusetts exempted a substantial portion of the caseload, mandating only parents with school-age children to participate in a work-related activity; (4) Utah permitted a broad range of activities to count as participation, tailoring activity to client circumstances, while Massachusetts and Michigan limited the activities for recipients required to participate to job search, followed by a job or, in the case of Massachusetts, by community service if a job is not found after 60 days; (5) all three states reported being able to provide the services specified in their plans to support clients in their activities; (6) they accomplished this in different ways: (a) by increasing available services; (b) by limiting participation requirements to fit available resources; or (c) by providing lower cost services; (7) the three states had a common strategy of strengthening sanctions for noncompliance as a tool to increase participation; (8) Massachusetts, Michigan, and Utah were able to engage a substantial number of welfare recipients in work and work-oriented activities; (9) most recipients who counted as participating were working in unsubsidized jobs, which reflects the emphasis placed on work in all three programs as well as changes to the amount of income they can earn and continue to receive benefits; (10) on the basis of GAO's analysis of state participation data, it is almost certain that these three states will meet their all-families target participation rate in the first year; but according to state officials, future rates may prove more difficult to achieve; (11) furthermore, Massachusetts and Michigan are concerned about their ability to meet the higher two-parent families rates; (12) all three states are concerned about meeting the future all-families rates, which are not only higher but require more hours of participation; and (13) state officials expressed concern that as employable recipients find jobs, the remaining caseload will consist of individuals with substantial barriers to employment, making the higher future target rates difficult to achieve.

Sep 15, 2016

Sep 7, 2016

Jul 8, 2016

Mar 14, 2016

Mar 10, 2016

Feb 23, 2016

Nov 9, 2015

Sep 16, 2015

Jun 15, 2015

Jun 3, 2015

Looking for more? Browse all our products here