Mandated Studies to Review Costly Bank and Thrift Failures
GGD-95-126, Jul 31, 1995
Pursuant to a legislative requirement, GAO: (1) assessed the preparations, procedures, and audit guidelines that certain Inspectors General (IG) have established for material loss reviews (MLR); (2) verified the information contained in the MLR reports; (3) recommended improvements in bank supervision based on MLR reports issued between July 1, 1993, and June 30, 1994; and (4) assessed the economy and efficiency of the MLR process.
GAO found that the IG reviewed have satisfied their MLR responsibilities by: (1) establishing a statement of understanding that coordinates their performance of MLR; (2) initiating and completing several pilot studies; (3) hiring staff with bank and audit experience; and (4) developing relevant training programs and comprehensive audit guidelines. In addition, GAO found that: (1) if MLR guidelines are implemented correctly, they will be adequate to determine the causes of bank failures and the quality of bank supervision; (2) the costs associated with producing MLR reports can be considerable and may cause temporary operational disruptions to IG offices; and (3) MLR requirements do not always give IG sufficient time to review reports prepared by other Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) officials who investigated causes of bank failures.
- Review Pending
- Closed - implemented
- Closed - not implemented
Recommendation for Executive Action
Recommendation: The Inspector General, FDIC, should, in future MLR reports, take steps to more fully assess the effectiveness of FDIC enforcement actions.
Agency Affected: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Status: Closed - Implemented
Comments: The agency implemented the recommendation in the two MLR reports issued subsequent to the GAO report. The MLR reports assessed the effectiveness of FDIC enforcement actions against troubled banks and made recommendations for improvement.
Matters for Congressional Consideration
Matter: Congress may wish to consider whether the current MLR requirement, which requires IG to report on bank and thrift failures costing the deposit insurance funds in excess of $25 million, is a cost-effective means of achieving the requirement's intended benefit--to help improve bank supervision. If it determines that the requirement is not cost-effective, Congress can choose to either repeal or amend the requirement. Of these options, amending the current MLR requirement may be more desirable because it would allow the IG to continue their bank supervision work and also provide them greater flexibility in managing their resources.
Status: Closed - Not Implemented
Comments: Congress has not yet taken action.
Matter: Congress should consider repealing the mandate to review MLR on an annual basis.
Status: Closed - Implemented
Comments: Action was completed by passage of P.L. 104-316.