Pay For Performance:

State and International Public Sector Pay-For-Performance Systems

GGD-91-1: Published: Oct 12, 1990. Publicly Released: Oct 12, 1990.

Additional Materials:

Contact:

Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800
youngc1@gao.gov

Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO examined: (1) whether and to what extent state governments operated pay-for-performance compensation systems; (2) the problems experienced by those systems and their similarity to those experienced under the federal government's Performance Management and Recognition System; and (3) the extent to which foreign countries used pay-for-performance systems.

GAO found that: (1) 23 states indicated that they used pay-for-performance systems; (2) 14 of the 23 states implemented their systems within the last 10 years, and at least 3 other states indicated they were either studying or actually implementing a pay-for-performance system; (3) most of the states used annual employee performance appraisal review systems for their pay-for-performance systems; (4) 21 of the 23 states required the establishment of performance standards to measure employees' actual job performance; (5) in many of the states, employees and supervisors jointly developed work standards; (6) all 23 states had a payout system for performance awards which based award on the employee's performance; (7) state funding information showed some variance as to whether and at what amounts states were funding their pay-for-performance systems; (8) the average annual performance award for eight states ranged from a low of about $400 to a high of $2,831 per employee; (9) 63 of the 75 state employees interviewed believed that inadequate or inconsistent state funding sometimes hindered or undermined the system's goals; (10) the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) reported that 13 of its 24 member countries operated performance appraisal systems of some type in the public service; and (11) OECD countries' pay-for-performance systems varied in employees covered and in appraisal and payout components.

Sep 1, 2016

Aug 19, 2016

Jun 8, 2016

Mar 24, 2016

Jan 11, 2016

Jun 16, 2015

Apr 16, 2015

Mar 9, 2015

Jan 30, 2015

Jan 6, 2015

Looking for more? Browse all our products here