Special Agents Should Be Phased Out as FBI Crime Laboratory Examiners

GGD-80-60: Published: Jul 18, 1980. Publicly Released: Jul 18, 1980.

Additional Materials:

Contact:

Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800
youngc1@gao.gov

Within the criminal justice community, the high costs of the special pay and retirement benefits granted to law enforcement officers have prompted analysis of the need for officers to staff support positions. The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) crime laboratory represents an untapped opportunity to achieve economies by replacing special agents with civilian examiners. Of the four major Federal crime laboratories, only the FBI uses special agents as laboratory examiners. The FBI believes that special agent examiners bring an extra dimension to the analysis of physical evidence. It claims that agent/examiners provide superior examination services, make better court witnesses, and perform better field support functions. These views are not fully shared by the heads of other Federal laboratories; nor are they supported by the users of the laboratories, the majority of the examiners, and Federal prosecutors.

While having special agents as examiners has some benefits, the benefits are largely intangible and infrequent and, therefore, do not outweigh the added costs. Specifically, GAO found that: (1) officials at other Federal laboratories believed the use of agent/examiners was not essential; (2) laboratory examiners, FBI agent/examiners included, did not believe that investigative experience was useful in performing the majority of physical evidence analyses, and investigative experience did not alter the nature of laboratory examinations; (3) investigators who used Federal laboratories were equally satisfied with the services provided by all laboratories; (4) Federal prosecutors believed examiners from all Federal laboratories provided effective court testimony; and (5) FBI agent/examiners rarely performed field investigative support. The FBI laboratory is concerned that civilian staffing would lead to personnel turnover, resulting in an unstable workforce and high training costs. However, other Federal crime laboratories report no problems in retaining personnel. Finally, the use of special agent personnel impose significant additional costs compared to civilian personnel. These costs arise because criminal investigators are usually higher graded and recieve special retirement benefits. GAO estimates that annual cost savings of over $.5 million are possible. Firm estimates of the potential cost savings depend on decisions regarding staffing and compensation.

Recommendation for Executive Action

  1. Status: Closed

    Comments: Please call 202/512-6100 for additional information.

    Recommendation: The Attorney General should direct the FBI to develop and implement a plan leading to the orderly transition to a civilian workforce in the FBI crime laboratory. Such a plan would necessarily include a position classification and staffing study, and it would be useful to request the services of the Justice Department's Position Classification and Pay Management Group, or the Office of Personnel Management's Agency Compliance and Evaluation Group. Both groups have expertise in performing classification studies and in developing cost estimates for alternative staffing practices.

    Agency Affected:

 

Explore the full database of GAO's Open Recommendations »

Sep 21, 2016

Aug 3, 2016

Aug 1, 2016

Jul 14, 2016

Jul 5, 2016

Jun 30, 2016

Jun 28, 2016

Jun 23, 2016

Jun 22, 2016

Looking for more? Browse all our products here