Customs' Efforts To Develop a System for Assigning Inspectors Need Top Management Support

GGD-78-48: Published: May 2, 1978. Publicly Released: May 2, 1978.

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

The method the U.S. Customs Service uses to allocate inspectors to ports-of-entry has created staffing inconsistencies and the potential for their inefficient use. Although Customs has been aware of these shortcomings for many years, only recently have efforts been made to correct the problem. In August 1976, Customs established the Productivity Task Force to develop an approach to productivity management.

Despite the magnitude of its responsibilities, Customs does not have a system which provides detailed information on its inspection efforts and which relates such efforts to accomplishments, considering such factors as volume, processing complexity, enforcement risks, and facility restrictions. In addition, Customs terminology has not been standardized, thereby hindering the conversion of workload data to staffing requirements. A review of Customs operations at several locations showed no apparent correlation between the number of inspectors assigned to a port-of-entry and the workload in terms of activity levels, work complexity, or enforcement risks. Efforts to correct these problems through the Productivity Management and Improvement Program appear to be weakening, and top management support is needed if Customs is to make a more rational allocation of inspectors.

Recommendation for Executive Action

  1. Status: Closed

    Comments: Please call 202/512-6100 for additional information.

    Recommendation: The Secretary of the Treasury should direct the Commissioner of Customs to provide the Productivity Task Force the necessary leadership and the authority, guidance, and personnel to accomplish its objectives; monitor the progress of the Productivity Management and Improvement Program; and develop standardized Customs terminology for current and proposed information systems.

    Agency Affected:


Explore the full database of GAO's Open Recommendations »

May 23, 2016

May 17, 2016

May 9, 2016

Apr 26, 2016

Apr 5, 2016

Feb 22, 2016

Feb 11, 2016

Feb 1, 2016

Dec 16, 2015

Dec 2, 2015

Looking for more? Browse all our products here