Cooperative Threat Reduction:

Status of Defense Conversion Efforts in the Former Soviet Union

NSIAD-97-101: Published: Apr 11, 1997. Publicly Released: Apr 11, 1997.

Contact:

Harold J. Johnson, Jr
(202) 512-4128
contact@gao.gov

 

Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800
youngc1@gao.gov

Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed the Department of Defense's (DOD) program to help convert defense industries in the former Soviet Union to commercial enterprises, focusing on: (1) the effect of defense conversion efforts on the elimination or reduction of military activities and production capabilities in former Soviet weapons of mass destruction enterprises; (2) the status of defense conversion projects and funding; and (3) conformance of the Defense Enterprise Fund's management practices to its grant agreement and the Fund's operating expenses.

GAO noted that: (1) given the vast size of the former Soviet Union's weapons complex and the numerous variables involved in trying to assess and quantify military production capacity, including unknown factors such as possible modernization or consolidations at other locations, GAO was unable to confirm that the defense conversion projects GAO reviewed had any direct impact on eliminating or reducing weapons of mass destruction or other military production capacity in the former Soviet Union; (2) nonetheless, of the 24 projects GAO reviewed, 20 had indigenous partners that DOD identified as firms that had been engaged in producing weapons of mass destruction, and one project involved converting resources that were still engaged in producing weapons of mass destruction; (3) GAO's analysis also showed that at least 11 projects had directly used buildings formerly engaged in activities related to weapons of mass destruction, and at least 8 projects had employed former workers from weapons of mass destruction-related activities at the newly established enterprises; (4) according to DOD officials, the defense conversion projects are providing assistance to firms that have large numbers of underutilized and often unpaid employees; (5) DOD officials hope that the projects will become commercially viable and that the indigenous parent firms will invest additional resources that might have otherwise been used for producing weapons of mass destruction or other military hardware; (6) five of the 24 defense conversion projects were no longer operating at the time of GAO's review; (7) the remaining 19 projects have made varying degrees of progress in setting up commercial businesses, but eight of the projects had not begun production; (8) four of the projects that had reached production were moving forward, and for one of these projects the U.S. partner bought the Russian partner's share of the joint venture; (9) three of the four housing projects are nearly complete but have not established commercial enterprises; (10) two of the housing projects were construction projects and were not intended to generate ongoing businesses; (11) as of March 1997, DOD had notified Congress that it planned to spend a total of $179.7 million on defense conversion projects and had disbursed $143 million, including $51.7 million granted to the Defense Enterprise Fund (DEF); and (12) the DEF has complied with many elements of the grant agreement with the Defense Special Weapons Agency (DSWA), but it has not finalized some key grant requirements, and DSWA has not enforced compliance.

Status Legend:

More Info
  • Review Pending-GAO has not yet assessed implementation status.
  • Open-Actions to satisfy the intent of the recommendation have not been taken or are being planned, or actions that partially satisfy the intent of the recommendation have been taken.
  • Closed-implemented-Actions that satisfy the intent of the recommendation have been taken.
  • Closed-not implemented-While the intent of the recommendation has not been satisfied, time or circumstances have rendered the recommendation invalid.
    • Review Pending
    • Open
    • Closed - implemented
    • Closed - not implemented

    Recommendation for Executive Action

    Recommendation: In addition to the recent efforts DOD has initiated to strengthen its oversight of DEF, the Secretary of Defense should direct that: (1) performance benchmarks be established, as required by DOD's grant agreement with DEF; (2) a long-range plan for attracting private capital be prepared by DEF and approved by DOD; and (3) semiannual progress reviews and the required office and field visits be performed.

    Agency Affected: Department of Defense

    Status: Closed - Implemented

    Comments: The agency agreed with and implemented the recommendation.

    Jul 24, 2014

    Jul 21, 2014

    Jul 9, 2014

    Jul 8, 2014

    Jun 26, 2014

    Jun 25, 2014

    Looking for more? Browse all our products here