Electricity Markets:

Four Regions Use Capacity Markets to Help Ensure Adequate Resources, but FERC Has Not Fully Assessed Their Performance

GAO-18-131: Published: Dec 7, 2017. Publicly Released: Dec 7, 2017.

Additional Materials:

Contact:

Frank Rusco
(202) 512-3841
ruscof@gao.gov

 

Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800
youngc1@gao.gov

To ensure there will be enough electricity from power plants to meet customers' future needs, some U.S. electricity grid operators use "capacity markets." In capacity markets, power plant owners are paid for committing that their plants will be available to provide electricity during a specified future time period, encouraging them to build new power plants and retain existing ones.

We reviewed the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's oversight of capacity markets and found it has not adequately assessed their performance. We recommended that the commission improve data quality and more fully assess markets' performance and risks.

Areas of the United States with Electricity Grid Capacity Markets

Map of the United States showing areas that have electricity grid capacity markets

Map of the United States showing areas that have electricity grid capacity markets

Additional Materials:

Contact:

Frank Rusco
(202) 512-3841
ruscof@gao.gov

 

Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800
youngc1@gao.gov

What GAO Found

In four regions of the United States, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) has approved capacity markets. These markets are generally designed to provide an additional financial incentive to build and retain enough power plants to meet electricity needs, beyond incentives provided through other electricity markets. However, these four capacity markets have differences. For example, two obtain commitments from plant owners 3 years before electricity is needed, while two obtain commitments closer to when electricity is needed.

Available information on the level of resource adequacy—the availability of adequate power plants and other resources to meet customers' electricity needs—and related costs in regions with and without capacity markets is not comprehensive or consistent. For example, available data show that regions with capacity markets spent over $51 billion from 2013 through 2016 for commitments from power plant owners that their plants would be available to provide electricity. However, these payments may not reflect the full cost of resource adequacy in these regions, and data on the other costs were not available. Moreover, consistent data on historical trends in resource adequacy and related costs are not available for regions without capacity markets, though forward-looking projections based on the latest available data indicate that most of the country is expected to have adequate resources through 2026. FERC collects some useful information in regions with and without capacity markets, but GAO identified problems with data quality, such as inconsistent data. According to federal standards for internal control, agencies should use quality information to achieve their objectives. By improving data quality, FERC's and Congress' ability to understand and oversee the capacity markets could be enhanced.

FERC, with assistance from grid operators and others, conducts oversight of capacity markets to, among other things, detect potential misconduct by market participants. However, FERC has not fully assessed the overall performance of capacity markets. In particular, FERC has not established performance goals for capacity markets, measured progress against those goals, or used performance information to make changes to capacity markets as needed. GAO's prior work has found that federal agencies can use performance information to improve results. Additional performance goals could be useful, based on GAO's review of FERC and other documents. For example, in 2013, in an internal examination of one region's capacity market, FERC staff identified five desirable characteristics—for example, whether power plants and other resources receiving capacity payments were available when needed—against which FERC conducted a one-time assessment. This represents one example of performance goals that FERC could develop to measure capacity market performance, but FERC has not conducted this analysis for other regions with capacity markets nor updated this analysis. Capacity markets have faced performance problems in the past, with three regions raising concerns since 2014 that the design of their markets was not sufficient to ensure that there were adequate resources to meet customer demand in their regions. By more fully assessing performance, FERC may increase opportunities to identify and address potential performance problems and to share effective approaches across capacity markets. This may help ensure customers do not pay more than necessary for resource adequacy.

Why GAO Did This Study

Electricity grid operators, who operate the network of power lines, seek to ensure they will have adequate resources, such as power plants, to meet customers' future electricity needs. Grid operators use various approaches to do so, including capacity markets—markets through which owners of power plants can be paid in exchange for making a commitment that their power plant will be available to provide electricity at a specified time in the future. FERC is responsible for overseeing grid operators as well as capacity and other electricity markets to ensure that the markets result in prices that are “just and reasonable.”

A report accompanying a bill for 2016 energy and water development appropriations includes a provision for GAO to review the use of capacity markets in the United States. GAO's report (1) describes U.S. capacity markets, (2) examines available information about resource adequacy and related costs in regions with and without capacity markets, and (3) examines the oversight of capacity markets. To conduct this work, GAO analyzed data on electricity costs and resource trends from the four regions with capacity markets, reviewed relevant reports and filings, and interviewed government officials and grid operators' representatives.

What GAO Recommends

GAO is making three recommendations, including that FERC (1) take steps to improve the quality of its data and (2) regularly assess the overall performance of capacity markets. FERC generally agreed with GAO's findings and recommendations.

For more information, contact Frank Rusco at (202) 512-3841 or ruscof@gao.gov.

Recommendations for Executive Action

  1. Status: Open

    Comments: When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.

    Recommendation: FERC should take steps to improve the quality of data collected for its Common Metrics Report, such as implementing improved data quality checks and, where feasible, ensuring Regional Transmission Organization (RTOs) are reporting consistent metrics over time by standardizing definitions. (Recommendation 1)

    Agency Affected: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

  2. Status: Open

    Comments: When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.

    Recommendation: FERC should regularly assess the overall performance of capacity markets by developing goals for assessing capacity market performance, measuring the performance of capacity markets against these goals, and using performance information to make changes as needed to capacity markets. To do so, FERC should leverage data and information already being collected by FERC, the RTOs, and the independent market monitors. (Recommendation 2)

    Agency Affected: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

  3. Status: Open

    Comments: When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.

    Recommendation: FERC should develop and document an approach to regularly identify, assess, and respond to risks that capacity markets face. (Recommendation 3)

    Agency Affected: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

 

Explore the full database of GAO's Open Recommendations »

Dec 7, 2017

Nov 14, 2017

Nov 1, 2017

Oct 26, 2017

Sep 8, 2017

Sep 5, 2017

May 26, 2017

May 25, 2017

May 24, 2017

May 17, 2017

Looking for more? Browse all our products here