Skip to main content

Telecommunications: GSA Needs to Share and Prioritize Lessons Learned to Avoid Future Transition Delays

GAO-14-63 Published: Dec 05, 2013. Publicly Released: Jan 06, 2014.
Jump To:
Skip to Highlights

Highlights

What GAO Found

Complex acquisition processes and weaknesses in project planning contributed to the delays experienced on the Networx transition, resulting in cost increases and missed savings. In particular, the complexity of the acquisition process was related to duplicative contract vehicles, the large number of service options, and changes related to the process for ensuring fair competition among service providers, among others. These issues were reported by the General Services Administration (GSA) to have been compounded by a decline in contracting and technical expertise within the agencies. GAO has identified skills gaps in the federal workforce as a government-wide high-risk area and highlighted the need for agencies to work with the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) to close them. Weaknesses in agencies' project planning also contributed to the delays. For example, agencies tended to transition easier items first, to demonstrate progress, before they transitioned items that needed a long lead time such as data networks and international services. As a result of the delays, GSA's estimated cost to complete the transition increased by $66.4 million, 44 percent over the baseline estimate. In addition to the extra transition costs, agencies may have paid more for similar services by staying on the FTS2001 contracts longer than planned. Specifically, in April 2010, GSA estimated that agencies could have saved 28.4 percent of their spending on FTS2001 by using Networx contracts instead. Based on this rate of savings, GAO estimates that agencies could have saved about $329 million if they had transitioned to Networx on time.

The extent to which GSA is documenting and applying lessons learned in preparation for the next telecommunications transition varies. GSA has fully or partially satisfied five of six key practices necessary for a robust lessons learned process. To its credit, GSA has collected, analyzed, and validated lessons learned from the Networx transition. However, it has not fully shared these lessons with its customer agencies or prioritized them to ensure that resources are applied to areas with the greatest return on investment. GSA plans to finalize its next telecommunications acquisition strategy in December 2013 and begin the next transition when it awards new contracts in February 2017. Fully addressing key lessons learned practices should help GSA and agencies better plan for and execute the next telecommunications transition.

Why GAO Did This Study

GSA is responsible for ensuring that federal agencies have access to the telecommunications services and solutions needed to meet their mission requirements. As agencies' telecommunications needs have evolved, so too have GSA's contracts to help support them. Its latest contracts, signed in 2007 and collectively called Networx, provide transport; Internet protocol; wireless; and management and application services, among others. In fiscal year 2012, agencies spent over $1.4 billion on Networx services. However, the transition from the previous telecommunications contracts, known as FTS2001, has not been easy, taking almost 3 years longer than planned.

GAO's objectives were to determine (1) what factors contributed to the delay in transitioning services to Networx and the consequences due to the delay, and (2) to what extent GSA is documenting and applying lessons learned as it prepares for the next telecommunications contract transition. GAO examined lessons learned activities and supporting documents, cost and missed savings estimates, performed case studies at two agencies with large delays, and interviewed agency and service provider officials.

Recommendations

GAO recommends that, in preparing for the next transition, GSA, in coordination with OPM, examine potential government-wide expertise shortfalls, and that it provide agencies guidance on project planning and fully archive, share, and prioritize lessons learned. GSA and OPM agreed with GAO's recommendations.

Recommendations for Executive Action

Agency Affected Recommendation Status
General Services Administration To improve planning and execution of the next telecommunications transition, the Administrator of General Services, in coordination with the Office of Personnel Management, should examine potential government-wide telecommunications expertise shortfalls and use the study to shape the NS2020 strategic approach.
Closed – Not Implemented
The General Services Administration (GSA) has not addressed this recommendation. In June 2014, GSA stated that it planned to perform a telecommunications workforce assessment and share its work with OPM. However, in June 2018, GSA stated that it no longer planned to implement the recommendation.
General Services Administration To improve planning and execution of the next telecommunications transition, the Administrator of General Services should ensure that project planning guidance to agencies on the future transition calls for establishing transition plans with detailed time lines that take into account priorities relative to agencies' mission-critical systems, contingency plans, and identified risks, and are updated to reflect the current status and endpoint of the transition.
Closed – Implemented
The General Services Administration (GSA) has implemented this recommendation. Specifically, in August 2014, GSA developed a handbook to facilitate agencies' efforts to transition from Networx to a new enterprise infrastructure solutions contracts. The handbook calls for agencies to develop a transition project management plan that includes a time line of all activities that need to be completed, priorities relative to the agency's mission critical systems, contingency plans, and identified risks.
General Services Administration
Priority Rec.
To improve planning and execution of the next telecommunications transition, the Administrator of General Services should populate and maintain on an ongoing basis the agency's transition lessons-learned database with the lessons GSA has identified and make it available for user searches by those involved in developing the next transition strategy.
Closed – Implemented
The General Services Administration (GSA) has implemented this recommendation. Specifically, it updated its lessons-learned database with information from its July 2012 lessons-learned report about the previous transition and, in August 2014, provided guidance to agencies on reviewing lessons in the database. According to the guidance, GSA plans to periodically post extracts from the database in searchable format. In addition, for the most current data, those involved in developing the next transition strategy (i.e., the NS2020 program team), including agencies, will be able to request that GSA perform searches of the database, based on criteria, and provide reports on the search results.
General Services Administration To improve planning and execution of the next telecommunications transition, the Administrator of General Services should prioritize the lessons, taking into particular consideration the factors GAO reported as contributing to delays, and determine the resources needed to apply them.
Closed – Implemented
The General Services Administration has implemented this recommendation. Specifically, it has prioritized the lessons-learned and identified the factors we reported as contributing to delays. GSA has also demonstrated that it determined the resources needed to apply the lessons.
General Services Administration To improve planning and execution of the next telecommunications transition, the Administrator of General Services should ensure that the lessons are applied, based on priority and available resources, to the next transition strategy.
Closed – Implemented
In July 2017, the General Services Administration (GSA) demonstrated that it implemented this recommendation. Specifically, it prioritized the lessons learned (e.g., agencies need extensive telecommunications acquisition assistance), demonstrated that it considered the resources needed to apply the lessons, and demonstrated that the lessons were applied, based on priority and available resources, to the next transition strategy. For example, to address agencies' need for increased resources skilled in telecommunications to assist with the transition, in May 2015, GSA completed, among other things, an alternatives analysis and a financial analysis. Then, in September 2016, GSA awarded a task order for transition ordering assistance.

Full Report

Office of Public Affairs

Topics

ArchivesBest practicesContingency plansContract administrationContract extensionsCost effectiveness analysisData collectionFederal agenciesInformation managementInternetLabor forceLessons learnedMission critical systemsProcurement planningProgram managementRisk assessmentSchedule slippagesStrategic planningTelecommunicationsSavings estimates