Navy Strategy for Unmanned Carrier-Based Aircraft System Defers Key Oversight Mechanisms
GAO-13-833: Published: Sep 26, 2013. Publicly Released: Sep 26, 2013.
What GAO Found
In fiscal year 2014, the Navy plans to commit to investing an estimated $3.7 billion to develop, build, and field from 6 to 24 aircraft as an initial increment of Unmanned Carrier-Launched Airborne Surveillance and Strike (UCLASS) capability. However, it is not planning to hold a Milestone B review--a key decision that formally initiates a system development program and triggers key oversight mechanisms--until after the initial UCLASS capability has been developed and fielded in fiscal year 2020. The Navy views UCLASS as a technology development program, although it encompasses activities commensurate with system development, including system integration and demonstration. Because the initial UCLASS system is to be developed, produced, and fielded before a Milestone B decision, Congress's ability to oversee the program and hold it accountable for meeting cost, schedule, and performance goals will likely be limited. Specifically, the program will operate outside the basic oversight framework provided by mechanisms like a formal cost and schedule baseline, statutory unit cost tracking, and regular reports to Congress on cost, schedule, and performance progress. The Navy believes its approach effectively utilizes the flexibility in the Department of Defense's (DOD) acquisition policy to gain knowledge needed to ensure a successful UCLASS system development program starting in fiscal year 2020. Yet the Navy expects to review preliminary designs, conduct a full and open competition, and award a contract for UCLASS development in fiscal year 2014, a point at which DOD policy and best practices indicate that a program would be expected to hold a Milestone B review to initiate a system development program. Apart from deferring Milestone B, the Navy's plan would be consistent with the knowledge-based acquisition process reflected in DOD policy.
UCLASS faces several programmatic risks going forward. First, the UCLASS cost estimate of $3.7 billion exceeds the level of funding that the Navy expects to budget for the system through fiscal year 2020. Second, the Navy has scheduled 8 months between the time it issues its request for air vehicle design proposals and the time it awards the air vehicle contract, a process that DOD officials note typically takes 12 months to complete. Third, the UCLASS system is heavily reliant on the successful development and delivery of other systems and software, which creates additional schedule risk. Fourth, the Navy will be challenged to effectively manage and act as the lead integrator for three separate but interrelated segments--air vehicle, carrier, and control system--and 22 other government systems, such as the aircraft landing system, the timing and alignment of which are crucial to achieving the desired UCLASS capability. While the Navy recognizes many of these risks and has mitigation plans in place, they could lead to cost increases and schedule delays if not effectively addressed.
The Navy's UCLASS acquisition strategy includes some good acquisition practices that reflect aspects of a knowledge-based approach. For example, the Navy is leveraging significant knowledge gained from prior technology development efforts, incorporating an open systems design approach, working to match the system's requirements with available resources, and reviewing preliminary designs for the air vehicle before conducting a competition to select a single contractor to develop and deliver the air vehicle segment.
Why GAO Did This Study
The Navy estimates that it will need $3.7 billion from fiscal year 2014 through fiscal year 2020 to develop and field an initial UCLASS system. The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 mandated that GAO evaluate the UCLASS system acquisition strategy. This report (1) assesses the UCLASS acquisition strategy, (2) identifies key areas of risk facing the system, and (3) notes areas where the Navy's strategy contains good practices. To do this work, GAO reviewed the Navy's acquisition strategy and compared it to DOD's acquisition policy, among other criteria; and reviewed Navy acquisition documents and spoke with Navy and Office of the Secretary of Defense officials.
What GAO Recommends
Congress should consider directing the Navy to hold a Milestone B review for the UCLASS system after the system level preliminary design review is complete.If the Navy does not comply, Congress should consider limiting the amount of funding available for the UCLASS system until an acquisition program baseline is provided. GAO included these matters for consideration because the Navy does not plan to make changes as a result of GAOs recommendation to hold a Milestone B review following the system level preliminary design reviewwhich is currently scheduled in fiscal year 2015. The Navy did not concur with the recommendation, and believes that its approved strategy is compliant with acquisition regulations and laws. GAO continues to believe that its recommendation is valid as discussed in this report.
For more information, contact Michael J. Sullivan at (202) 512-4841 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Recommendations for Executive Action
Comments: The Department of Defense, more specifically the Navy, non-concurred with our recommendation. The Secretary of Defense did not direct the Secretary of the Navy to hold a Milestone B review for the UCLASS system following the system level preliminary design review.
Recommendation: In order to provide for increased congressional oversight and program accountability, the Secretary of Defense should direct the Secretary of the Navy to hold a Milestone B decision review for the UCLASS system following the system level preliminary design review--which is currently scheduled in fiscal year 2015.
Agency Affected: Department of Defense
Comments: Congress did not direct the Navy to hold a Milestone B review for the UCLASS system after the system level preliminary design review is complete. However, in the Fiscal Year 2014 National Defense Authorization Act Congress did require the Navy limit the number of air vehicle segments acquired prior to receiving Milestone B approval and required the Navy to provide periodic reports on cost, schedule, and requirements changes for UCLASS. Furthermore, in the Fiscal Year 2015 National Defense Authorization Act Congress required the Navy, at the time of its fiscal year 2017 budget submission, to provide a report establishing a formal acquisition program cost and schedule baseline.
Recommendation: To enhance program oversight and accountability given that the Navy does not plan to modify its acquisition strategy and hold a Milestone B decision review for the UCLASS system following the system level preliminary design review in fiscal year 2015, Congress should consider directing the Navy to hold a Milestone B review for the system after the system level preliminary design review is complete.
Agency Affected: Congress
Status: Closed - Implemented
Comments: The Navy did not comply with our recommendation for the UCLASS to hold a Milestone B review after system level preliminary design review was complete. As a result, and as we asked Congress to consider, in the Fiscal Year 2014 National Defense Authorization Act Congress required that the Navy limit the number of air vehicle segments acquired prior to receiving Milestone B approval and required the Navy to provide periodic reports on cost, schedule, and requirements changes for UCLASS.
Recommendation: If the Navy does not comply, Congress should consider limiting the amount of funding available for the UCLASS system until the Navy provides the basic elements of an acquisition program baseline, such as development and production cost estimates, unit costs, quantities, schedules, annual funding profiles, and key performance parameters needed for such a large investment. The Navy should also be required to periodically report the program's status against the baseline.
Agency Affected: Congress