Department of Education: Final Priorities, Requirements, Definitions, and Selection Criteria--Teacher Incentive Fund (TIF) Program
GAO-12-971R: Aug 10, 2012
- Full Report:
GAO reviewed the Department of Education's (Education) new rule on the final prioritites, requirements, definitions and selection criteria of the Teacher Incentive Fund. GAO found that (1) the notice announces priorities, requirements, definitions, and selection criteria under the Teacher Incentive Fund program. Education may use one or more of these priorities, requirements, definitions, and selection criteria for competitions in fiscal year 2012, and later years; and (2) Education complied with the applicable requirements in promulgating the rule.
August 8, 2012
The Honorable Tom Harkin
The Honorable Michael B. Enzi
Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions
United States Senate
The Honorable John Kline
The Honorable George Miller
Committee on Education and the Workforce
House of Representatives
Subject: Department of Education: Final Priorities, Requirements, Definitions, and Selection CriteriaTeacher Incentive Fund (TIF) Program
Pursuant to section 801(a)(2)(A) of title 5, United States Code, this is our report on a major rule promulgated by the Department of Education (Education), entitled Final Priorities, Requirements, Definitions, and Selection CriteriaTeacher Incentive Fund (TIF) Program (RIN: 1810-AB12). We received the rule on July 24, 2012. It was published in the Federal Register as a notice on June 14, 2012. 77 Fed. Reg. 35,758.
The notice announces priorities, requirements, definitions, and selection criteria under the Teacher Incentive Fund program. Education may use one or more of these priorities, requirements, definitions, and selection criteria for competitions in fiscal year 2012, and later years.
The notice has an effective date of July 16, 2012. The Congressional Review Act (CRA) requires a 60-day delay in the effective date of a major rule from the date of publication in the Federal Register or receipt of the rule by Congress, whichever is later. 5 U.S.C. § 801(a)(3)(A). However, notwithstanding the 60-day delay requirement, any rule that an agency for good cause finds that notice and comment are impractical, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest is to take effect when the promulgating agency so determines. 5 U.S.C. § 808(2). In the case of this notice, Education determined that because it must award the funds to qualified applicants by September 30, 2012, or the funds will lapse, the 60-day delay is impracticable and contrary to the public interest. Therefore, Education found good cause to waive the 60-day delay in effective date.
Enclosed is our assessment of Educations compliance with the procedural steps required by section 801(a)(1)(B)(i) through (iv) of title 5 with respect to the rule. Our review of the procedural steps taken indicates that Education complied with the applicable requirements.
If you have any questions about this report or wish to contact GAO officials responsible for the evaluation work relating to the subject matter of the rule, please contact Shirley A. Jones, Assistant General Counsel, at (202) 512-8156.
Robert J. Cramer
Managing Associate General Counsel
cc: Michael Gross
Assistant General Counsel for
Department of Education
REPORT UNDER 5 U.S.C. § 801(a)(2)(A) ON A MAJOR RULE
ISSUED BY THE
Department of EDUCATION
"Final Priorities, Requirements, Definitions, and Selection CriteriaTeacher Incentive Fund (TIF) Program"
(i) Cost-benefit analysis
Education performed a cost-benefit analysis in conjunction with the notice. Education believes that the costs imposed by the notice are largely limited to the paperwork burden of preparing an application, as discussed below under the Paperwork Reduction Act. Education believes that the notice will result in the selection of high-quality applications to implement activities that will improve the quality of teaching and educational administration. Education also believes that the benefits of implementing the priorities and requirements justify any associated costs. Education states that its FY 2012 appropriation provides for new awards totaling $284.5 million.
(ii) Agency actions relevant to the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 603-605, 607, and 609
Education certified that the notice will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
(iii) Agency actions relevant to sections 202-205 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995, 2 U.S.C. §§ 1532-1535
The notice does not address the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA). The UMRA applies to rules that include any federal mandate that may result in expenditure by state, local, or tribal governments, in the aggregate, of $100 million or more. The notice describes the priorities, requirements, definitions, and selection criteria that applicants must provide in order to receive grant awards under the Teacher Incentive Fund program.
(iv) Other relevant information or requirements under acts and executive orders
Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 551 et seq.
Education published a notice of proposed rulemaking in the Federal Register on February 29, 2012. 77 Fed. Reg. 12,257. Education received comments from 32 parties, and Education responded to those comments in the final rule. 77 Fed. Reg. 35,758.
Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. §§ 3501-3520
The notice contains information collection requirements under the Paperwork Reduction Act. Education estimated that each applicant will spend approximately 248 hours of staff time to address priorities, requirements, definitions, and selection criteria, prepare the application, and obtain necessary clearances, and estimated that Education will receive approximately 120 applications. The total estimated cost for all applicants is $892,800. The information collection requirement has been assigned Office of Management and Budget (OMB) control number 1810-0700.
Statutory authorization for the rule
The notice is authorized by the Department of Education Appropriations Act, 2012, Pub. L. No. 112-74, Div. F, Title III, 125 Stat. 786, 1090 (Dec. 23, 2011).
Executive Order No. 12,866 (Regulatory Planning and Review)
Education determined that the notice is economically significant and subject to review by OMB.
Executive Order No. 13,132 (Federalism)
Education determined that the notice will not unduly interfere with state, local, or tribal governments in the exercise of their governmental functions.