Coordinated Federal Approach Needed to Better Manage Energy and Water Tradeoffs
GAO-12-880, Sep 13, 2012
What GAO Found
As GAOs past work has shown, and other studies and specialists have confirmed, there are a number of key energy-water nexus issues that Congress and federal agencies need to consider when developing and implementing national policies for energy and water resources. Specifically:
Location greatly influences the extent to which energy and water affect one another. For example, as GAO reported in November 2009, the impact of increased biofuel production on water resources will depend on where the feedstock is grown and whether or not irrigation is required. Consequently, it is important for Congress and federal agencies to consider the effects that national energy production and water use policies can have at the local level.
Although technologies and approaches exist to reduce the impact of energy development on water resources and reduce the energy needed to move, use, and treat water, their widespread adoption is inhibited by barriers such as economic feasibility and regulatory challenges. In implementing energy and water policies, Congress and federal agencies will also need to be cognizant of the barriers when deciding whether to promote the adoption of these technologies and approaches.
Making effective policy choices will continue to be challenging without more comprehensive data and research. GAOs past work has identified the need for more data and research related to the energy-water nexus, for example, to better understand hydrological processes, including aquifer recharge rates and groundwater movement. In the absence of such data and research, developing and implementing effective policies could continue to be a challenge for Congress and federal agencies.
Improved energy and water planning will require better coordination among federal agencies and other stakeholders. GAOs work has demonstrated that energy and water planning are generally stove-piped, with decisions about one resource made without considering impacts to the other resource. Improved planning will require federal agencies to work with one another and other stakeholders, such as state and local agencies, academia, industry, and environmental groups. Congress and some agencies have taken steps to improve coordination, but these actions are incomplete or in their early stages. For example, in the Energy Policy Act of 2005, Congress directed the Department of Energy (DOE) to establish a federal program to address the energy-water nexus, but DOE has not done so.
Uncertainties affecting energy and water resources cannot be ignored because they could significantly affect the future supply and demand of both resources. For example, specialists GAO talked to and literature GAO reviewed identified climate change, population growth, and demographic shifts as significant uncertainties expected to exacerbate the challenges associated with managing both the supply and demand of water and energy. These uncertainties must, therefore, be accounted for when developing national policies that affect both of these resources.
Why GAO Did This Study
Water and energy are inextricably linked and mutually dependent, with each affecting the others availability. Since 2009, GAO has issued five reports on the interdependencies between energy and water. These reports have shown that a considerable amount of water is used to cool thermoelectric power plants, grow feedstocks and produce biofuels, and extract oil and natural gas. Some of these sources of energy may also negatively affect water quality. In addition, developing oil and gas resources can produce wastewaterknown as produced waterthat must be managed or treated. Conversely, significant amounts of energy are needed to extract, transport, treat, and use water in urban areas.
GAO was asked to identify key energy-water nexus issues that Congress and federal agencies need to consider when developing and implementing national policies for energy and water resources. To conduct this work, GAO systematically reviewed its five reports to identify key nexus issues. GAO also used a content analysis of related literature and interviews with specialists to validate these themes.
What GAO Recommends
GAO is recommending that DOE take the actions necessary to establish a program to address the energy-water nexus, with involvement from other federal agencies, as described in the Energy Policy Act of 2005. DOE agreed with the recommendation and stated that it will work with other federal agencies and experts to implement it.
- Closed - implemented
- Closed - not implemented
Recommendation for Executive Action
Recommendation: To help address some of the research and data gaps that we and others have identified related to the tradeoffs associated with the energy and water nexus, and to ensure collaboration to address the nexus, the Secretary of Energy should take the actions necessary to establish a program to address the energy-water nexus, with involvement from other federal agencies as described in the Energy Policy Act of 2005.
Agency Affected: Department of Energy
Comments: In their February 2013 response letter to our report, DOE stated that it is taking steps to incorporate water into both internal research and development activities as well as engagements with other agencies and external stakeholders. Specifically, since the GAO report, DOE has completed a series of organization-wide internal workshops, followed by more technical sessions on particular energy-water nexus topics, such as thermoelectric cooling, water for energy production, and energy-water datasets and models. The goal of these sessions was to identify areas in which innovations may already exist, areas where solutions could provide benefit to multiple DOE research and development objectives, and areas where analytic tools could be developed with cross-cutting collaboration with other agencies. As a result of these initial efforts, DOE is moving forward with three initiatives: (1) establishing a cross-cutting DOE Energy-Water Technology Team, that will be responsible for coordinating further consultation on research and development activities that can benefit multiple programs; (2) building on existing agreements with other agencies, such as the MOU on Multi-Agency Collaboration on Unconventional Oil and Gas Research with EPA and USGS, and the MOU for hydropower with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Department of the Interior; and (3) outreaching to stakeholders from the private sector and other levels of government jurisdiction.