Skip to main content

Economic Development: Efficiency and Effectiveness of Fragmented Programs Are Unclear

GAO-11-872T Published: Jul 27, 2011. Publicly Released: Jul 27, 2011.
Jump To:
Skip to Highlights

Highlights

This testimony discusses the potential for overlap, duplication and fragmentation in economic development programs. In March 2011 and more recently in May 2011 we reported on potential duplication among federal economic development programs; this statement discusses this work. We are involved in ongoing work focusing on economic development programs; if they are administered efficiently and effectively, they can contribute to the well-being of our nation's economy at the least cost to taxpayers. Absent a common definition for economic development, we had previously developed a list of nine activities most often associated with economic development. These activities include planning and developing strategies for job creation and retention, developing new markets for existing products, building infrastructure by constructing roads and sewer systems to attract industry to undeveloped areas, and establishing business incubators to provide facilities for new businesses' operations. Our recent work includes information on 80 economic development programs at four agencies--the Departments of Commerce (Commerce), Housing and Urban Development (HUD), and Agriculture (USDA) and the Small Business Administration (SBA). Commerce administers 11 of the 80 programs. According to the agencies, funding provided for these 80 programs in fiscal year 2010 amounted to $6.2 billion, of which about $2.9 billion was for economic development efforts, largely in the form of grants, loan guarantees, and direct loans. Some of these 80 programs can fund a variety of activities, including such non-economic development activities as rehabilitating housing and building community parks. The testimony today discusses our work on (1) the potential for overlap in the design of these 80 economic development programs, (2) the extent to which the four agencies collaborate to achieve common goals, and (3) the extent to which the agencies have developed measures to determine the programs' effectiveness. We also discuss our framework for analysis going forward.

Full Report

Office of Public Affairs

Topics

AuthorizationBusiness development loansCommunity development programsData collectionEconomic analysisEconomic developmentEconomically depressed areasEmployment opportunitiesFederal agenciesGrants to statesHousing programsInteragency relationsProgram evaluationProgram managementPublic assistance programsRegional development programsRural economic developmentStrategic planningUrban economic developmentBusiness operationsDuplication of effortPolicies and procedures