Program Aimed at High-Risk Parent Abductors Could Aid in Preventing Abductions
GAO-11-602, Jun 23, 2011
Since 2000, the annual number of new international parental child abduction cases reported to the Department of State--many of which likely involved air travel--has nearly tripled. Such abductions occur when a parent, family member, or person acting on behalf thereof, takes a child to another country in violation of the custodial parent's or guardian's rights. Once a child is abducted, the laws, policies, and procedures of the foreign country determine the child's return. Thus, preventing such abductions can help keep parents and children from being separated for a long period or indefinitely. As requested, this report addresses (1) the policies and measures airlines, federal agencies, and others have to prevent international parental child abductions on airline flights and (2) options federal agencies, airlines, and others could consider for helping prevent such abductions on airline flights, as well as the advantages and limitations of those options. To perform this work, GAO reviewed applicable laws and policies, interviewed government officials, and surveyed airlines and nonprofit associations.
As private sector entities, airlines do not have the authority to verify or enforce court and custody orders in an effort to prevent international parental child abductions and thus, upon request, work in cooperation with law enforcement. The Department of State has measures such as a dual-signature passport requirement and a passport notification program that are focused on preventing abductions before abductors reach an airport. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has measures that are focused on prevention when abductors reach the airport, such as a Prevent Departure list which prevents non-U.S. citizens from departing on an international flight with a child of concern, if certain criteria are met. DHS also checks the National Crime Information Center Missing Persons File and has partnered with other agencies to distribute AMBER Alerts at airports if child abductions meet certain criteria. Two options--a parental-consent letter requirement and a high-risk abductor list--were cited by stakeholders (federal agency, airline, and nongovernmental organization officials) as having potential to prevent abductions, but consent letters may be impractical to adopt while a high-risk list may help prevent some abductions. A consent letter policy could require that children traveling alone, or without both parents, have a note of consent from the nonaccompanying parents authorizing the child to travel. Stakeholders GAO met with and surveyed noted that such consent letters may be effective in deterring some abductions, but the relative ease in forging a letter along with other significant issues indicate that such a requirement is not a practical option. A high-risk abductor list program could operate similarly to the Prevent Departure list program but would apply to U.S. citizens. While stakeholders pointed out certain limitations to such a high-risk abductor list--such as the relatively difficult and time-consuming steps needed to place a child and potential abductor on this list--such a list may be helpful in preventing abductions on airline flights. GAO recommends that DHS consider creating a program similar to the child abduction component of its Prevent Departure program that would apply to U.S. citizens. DHS concurred with the recommendation, but cited challenges toward implementing it, such as potential constitutional, operational, privacy, and resource issues.
- Closed - implemented
- Closed - not implemented
Recommendation for Executive Action
Recommendation: To further help prevent international parental child abductions involving airline flights, particularly for persons identified as high risk for attempting such abductions, the Secretary of Homeland Security should consider creating a program similar to the child abduction component of the Prevent Departure program that would apply to U.S. citizens.
Agency Affected: Department of Homeland Security
Status: Closed - Implemented
Comments: In 2011, we reported that the annual number of new international child parental abduction cases for which parents requested State Department assistance had nearly tripled since 2000. The State Department reported that, from fiscal year 2007 through 2009, it received 3,011 parental abduction requests for assistance in returning 4,365 children to the United States from other countries. Although the Department of Homeland Security (DHS)--in collaboration with the airlines--screens all travelers boarding international flights, the United States does not generally exercise exit controls on its borders that would prevent U.S. citizens holding a valid passport from leaving the country with a child. However, DHS administers a child abduction component of its broader Prevent Departure program, designed to keep non-U.S. citizens identified as potential abductors from leaving the country with a child at risk for abduction. DHS has found this program to be effective at preventing non-U.S. citizens identified as high risk from undertaking international parental child abductions. Thus, a similar program designed to prevent U.S. citizens identified as high risk for undertaking these abductions from departing on an international flight with an identified child could be appropriate. To establish such a program, DHS would need to explore other current existing statutory authority or seek new authority to administer a program similar to the Prevent Departure program that would apply to U.S. citizens. Also, DHS may need additional financial resources to implement such a program. Therefore, we recommended that the Secretary of Homeland Security consider creating a program similar to the child abduction component of the Prevent Departure program that would apply to U.S. citizens. In response, DHS has held several internal discussions among involved Components to determine the feasibility of creating a program applicable to U.S. Citizens to prevent child abduction. DHS contends that constitutional, operational, financial, privacy and resource challenges thwart any attempts to implement such a program at the present time or in the foreseeable future. Nevertheless, DHS is in a better position to understand what statutory authority and financial resources it would need to implement such a program.