Medicare Part D:

Opportunities Exist for Improving Information Sent to Enrollees and Scheduling the Annual Election Period

GAO-09-4: Published: Dec 12, 2008. Publicly Released: Dec 12, 2008.

Additional Materials:

Contact:

Kathleen M. King
(202) 512-3000
contact@gao.gov

 

Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800
youngc1@gao.gov

In Medicare Part D, enrollees in stand-alone prescription drug plans (PDPs) are allowed to switch plans during an annual coordinated election period (AEP) set under law from November 15 to December 31, with new coverage effective January 1. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) required that plan sponsors send an Annual Notice of Change (ANOC)--using either its model or a nonmodel format--before the 2008 AEP. Among other things, GAO examined: (1) stakeholders' views of the model ANOC and CMS's efforts to assure its effectiveness, and (2) how the scheduling of the AEP affects the enrollment process for beneficiaries switching PDPs. Among the largest PDP sponsors, we selected eight to interview along with other stakeholders involved in the AEP. We also obtained and analyzed data from CMS.

Sponsors, pharmacists, beneficiary advocates, and counselors GAO interviewed expressed concern that CMS's model ANOC for the 2008 AEP did not effectively communicate drug plan changes to enrollees. They noted that it contained language at a reading level too high for some beneficiaries as well as too much, often irrelevant, information. To help ensure their enrollees understood how plan changes would affect them personally, two study sponsors mailed additional information detailing specific changes in coverage and costs for drugs the beneficiary took in the past year. Despite GAO's previous recommendation that CMS ensure that its Part D materials meet communications guidelines, CMS's process for developing its model ANOC did not include a systematic evaluation of its effectiveness. However, CMS officials reported that they recently initiated an evaluation of their annual Medicare beneficiary materials for the 2010 AEP that will examine reading levels, effectiveness, and length, among other factors. Such an evaluation is important in light of changes CMS has made for the 2009 AEP, which have raised further concerns among stakeholders. It is unclear whether alternative formats for communicating plan changes to beneficiaries will be considered. Although CMS and plan sponsors made improvements to the enrollment process, CMS data showed that about 15 percent of beneficiaries who chose to switch plans in the 2008 AEP were not fully enrolled in their new plan by January 1. Modifications to the enrollment process for the 2008 AEP reduced the time needed to enroll beneficiaries in a new plan to a median of 5 days. However, the volume of applications submitted late in the AEP contributed to beneficiaries being at risk of not having access to their new coverage by January 1. In fact, among the beneficiaries who submitted applications after December 15, 40 percent were not completely processed until after the effective date of their new coverage. As a result, stakeholders reported that beneficiaries, pharmacies, and sponsors faced various operational challenges, including the risk of inaccurate charges and additional administrative burden. Some stakeholders we interviewed for our study said that creating an interval for enrollment processing between the end of the AEP and the effective date of coverage would help ensure that beneficiaries switching plans would have their coverage in place on January 1.

Matter for Congressional Consideration

  1. Status: Closed - Implemented

    Comments: The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act amended the schedule for the Part D annual election period.

    Matter: To improve the Part D enrollment process, Congress may wish to consider authorizing the Secretary of HHS to amend the current AEP schedule to include a sufficient processing interval to fully enroll beneficiaries prior to the effective date of their new coverage.

Recommendation for Executive Action

  1. Status: Closed - Implemented

    Comments: In its response to our request for follow-up, CMS reported that the recommendation in our report has been implemented. In addition, on June 1, 2011 CMS officials distributed a memo on the model marketing materials for 2012. In it they wrote of their important revisions to the ANOC template to improve communications. Notably, the agency created nine alternative ANOC templates to better accommodate the unique features of the various drug plans. CMS officials wrote that these templates incorporated comments from consumer advocacy groups, plan sponsors and health plan associations. They highlighted the use of plain language, the removal of three pages of duplicative information as well as minor changes in the presentation of cost information. According to CMS officials, the agency conducted two rounds of consumer testing and listening sessions with stakeholders and consumer advocates and condensed language in the new ANOC templates to ensure relevant content in each section. The agency reported that it will continue to evaluate existing communications for their effectiveness.

    Recommendation: To ensure that beneficiaries are informed effectively of plan changes, the Acting Administrator of CMS should strengthen the agency's evaluation of the Annual Notice of Change-Evidence of Coverage (ANOC-EOC) by reviewing alternative formats that include personalized drug coverage and cost information.

    Agency Affected: Department of Health and Human Services: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services

 

Explore the full database of GAO's Open Recommendations »

Oct 29, 2014

Oct 6, 2014

Oct 2, 2014

Sep 29, 2014

Sep 23, 2014

Sep 18, 2014

Sep 16, 2014

Sep 9, 2014

Looking for more? Browse all our products here