U.S.-China Trade: USTR's China Compliance Reports and Plans Could Be Improved
GAO-08-405
Published: Apr 14, 2008. Publicly Released: May 14, 2008.
Skip to Highlights
Highlights
Congress mandated that the United States Trade Representative (USTR) annually assess China's trade compliance and report its findings to Congress. In addition, USTR conducted an interagency "top-to-bottom review" of U.S. trade policies toward China. USTR's resulting February 2006 report outlined U.S objectives and action items. GAO was asked to (1) evaluate USTR's annual China trade compliance reports to Congress and the degree to which they present information necessary to fully understand China's compliance situation and (2) examine the status of the plans presented in USTR's February 2006 top-to-bottom report. GAO systematically analyzed the contents of USTR's compliance reports from 2002 to 2007 and reviewed information on the status of agencies' monitoring and enforcement activities.
Recommendations
Recommendations for Executive Action
| Agency Affected | Recommendation | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Office of the U.S. Trade Representative | To improve policymakers' and the public's understanding of China's trade compliance situation, the USTR should clearly and systematically identify the number, type, and disposition of the trade issues it is pursuing with China and report this and more useful trend information in its annual China trade compliance report to Congress. |
Closed – Not Implemented
In response to the GAO recommendation, USTR indicated, in a letter to congressional committees, that it was exploring how in its annual reports it would provide a more precise and easily tracked measure of the progress being achieved to ensure that China complies with its WTO commitments. The agency noted that quantifying these issues was inherently difficult and might restrict its ability to achieve substantive progress on WTO commitments with China. In addition, the agency noted that quantifying these issues may not be the most effective deployment of its resources. Since GAO's 2008 report, the Executive Summary of USTR's annual reports to Congress on China's WTO compliance have included a 2-3 page narrative summary table of China's WTO compliance efforts as well as an expanded history of events at key meetings. Nevertheless, these reports still fail to systematically identify the number, type, and disposition of the trade issues USTR is pursuing with China and report this and more useful quantitative and qualitative trend information in the summary analysis.
|
| Office of the U.S. Trade Representative | To help achieve U.S. trade objectives with China, USTR should update and improve the plans reported to Congress in its 2006 top-to-bottom report by considering recent developments and the results of ongoing U.S. monitoring and enforcement activities and by reviewing how specific implementing steps and action items align with broad objectives and priority goals. USTR should also take steps to formally monitor implementation of these plans over time. |
Closed – Not Implemented
USTR has indicated that its 2006 top-to-bottom report was a policy document and not a performance plan that needed to be updated periodically. They said the document was intended to provide a framework for how U.S. agencies should engage China and was not intended to establish a new mechanism for measuring performance or adjusting future goals. USTR indicated that it understood the need for updated information, so the agency would work to highlight the steps the Administration has taken to implement the top-to-bottom review and any major changes in the U.S.-China trade relations in the various annual reports USTR produces. Nevertheless, as stated in the report, GAO suggests that USTR reconsider its treatment of this report as a onetime policy statement and that it update and improve the report in order to enhance accountability and inform all stakeholders, including Congress and the public.
|
Full Report
Office of Public Affairs
Topics
Foreign governmentsForeign trade agreementsForeign trade policiesHuman capitalHuman capital planningInternal controlsInternational agreementsInternational cooperationInternational economic relationsInternational organizationsInternational relationsInternational tradeInternational trade regulationInternational trade restrictionMonitoringNoncompliancePerformance measuresProgram evaluationReporting requirementsStaff utilizationTrade agreementsTrade policiesTrade regulationProgram goals or objectivesProgram implementation