Environmental Protection Agency: Clean Air Fine Particle Implementation Rule
GAO-07-810R: May 10, 2007
- Full Report:
GAO reviewed the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) new rule on clean air fine particle implementation. GAO found that (1) the final rule requires states and tribal governments to develop plans to implement the 1997 fine particle (PM 2.5) national ambient air quality standards pursuant to the Clean Air Act and also requires that by April 5, 2008, each state and tribal government having a nonattainment area must submit to EPA an attainment demonstration and have adopted regulations ensuring that the area will attain the standards as expeditiously as practicable, but no later than 2015; and (2) EPA complied with all applicable requirements in promulgating the rule.
Environmental Protection Agency: Clean Air Fine Particle Implementation Rule, GAO-07-810R, May 10, 2007
Pursuant to section 801(a)(2)(A) of Title 5, United States Code, this is our report on a major rule promulgated by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), entitled Clean Air Fine Particle Implementation Rule (RIN: 2060-AK74).
The final rule requires states and tribal governments to develop plans to implement the 1997 fine particle (PM2.5) national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) pursuant to the Clean Air Act (CAA). Fine particles and precursor pollutants are emitted by a wide range of sources, including power plants, cars, trucks, and industrial sources. Air quality designations became effective on
This rule was published in the Federal Register as a final rule on
Enclosed is our assessment of the EPA's compliance with the procedural steps required by section 801(a)(1)(B)(i) through (iv) of Title 5 with respect to the rule. Our review indicates that EPA complied with the applicable requirements.
If you have any questions about this report, please contact Michael R. Volpe, Assistant General Counsel, at (202) 512-8236. The official responsible for GAO evaluation work relating to the subject matter of the rule is Robert Robinson, Managing Director, Natural Resources and Environment. Mr. Robinson can be reached at (202) 512-3841.
Robert J. Cramer
Associate General Counsel
(i) Cost-benefit analysis
EPA prepared an assessment of the estimated costs and benefits associated with attaining the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS in 2015, incremental to currently promulgated federal and state programs, including, for example, the Clean Air Interstate rule and the Nonroad Diesel rule. The analysis finds that the estimated monetized benefits of attaining the 1997 standards in 2015 are between $43 billion and $97 billion annually, and the estimated monetized costs are $6.9 billion annually. The analysis also states that because this analysis was intended to compare costs and benefits of attaining alternative standards by fixed dates, it did not attempt to identify for each designated PM2.5area measures that may be needed to meet subpart 1 Clean Air Act requirements, such as reasonable available measures and attainment as expeditiously as practicable. It is expected that additional costs and benefits will begin to accrue in earlier years as states comply with these requirements.
(ii) Agency actions relevant to the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. sections 603-605, 607, and 609
EPA certified that the final rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. For this reason, EPA did not prepare a Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis. EPA noted that implementation plans will not directly impose any requirements on small entities, but rather, interprets the obligations established in the CAA for states and tribal governments to submit implementation plans in order to attain the PM2.5 NAAQS.
(iii) Agency actions relevant to sections 202-205 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995, 2 U.S.C. sections 1532-1535
EPA certified that this final rule does not contain either an intergovernmental or private section mandate, as defined in Title II, of more than $100 million in any one year.
(iv) Other relevant information or requirements under acts and executive orders
Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. sections 551 et seq.
Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. sections 3501-3520
The information collection requirements in this final rule have been submitted for approval to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). EPA noted that in a separate Federal Register notice, EPA is requesting comment on the information collection requirements of this rule. The information collection requirements are not enforceable until OMB approves them.
Statutory authorization for the rule
The final rule was promulgated under the authority of 42 U.S.C. sections 7401, 7408, 7410, 7501-7509a, 7601(a)(1), and 7407(d).
Executive Order No. 12866
The final rule was reviewed by OMB and found to be an economically significant regulatory action under the order.
Executive Order No. 13,132 (Federalism)
EPA concluded that the proposed rule would not have federalism implications. Specifically, EPA stated that the proposed rule would not have substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship between the national government and the states, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13,132. However, EPA recognized that states would have a substantial interest in the proposed rule and any corresponding revisions to associated implementation plan requirements. Therefore, in the spirit of the Executive Order, and consistent with EPA policy to promote communications between EPA and state and local governments, EPA held a number of calls with representatives of state and local air pollution control agencies and hosted a public hearing in Washington, D.C. in November 2005. Although EPA considered the comments from state and local governments in developing the final rule, EPA concluded that the final rule does not have federalism implications.
Executive Order 13,175 (Consultation and Coordination with Tribal Governments)
EPA concluded that the proposed rule would not have "tribal implications" as defined in Executive Order 13,175. Specifically, EPA stated that the proposed rule concerns the requirements for state and tribal implementation plans for attaining the PM2.5 air quality standards. The CAA provides for states to develop plans to regulate emissions of air pollutants within their jurisdictions. The Tribal Air Rule under the CAA gives tribes the opportunity to develop and implement CAA programs such as programs to attain and maintain the PM2.5 NAAQS, but it leaves to the discretion of the tribe the decision of whether to develop these programs and which programs, or appropriate elements of a program, they will adopt. Although the executive order did not apply to the proposed rule, EPA stated that it did reach out to tribal leaders and environmental staff, but nonetheless concluded that the final rule does not have tribal implications.
Executive Order 13,045 (Protection of Children From Environmental Health and Safety Risks)
EPA concluded that this final rule is subject to Executive Order 13,045. EPA complied with this executive order by evaluating the environmental health or safety effects of the planned rule on children and explained why the planned regulation is preferable to other potentially effective and reasonably feasible alternatives.
Executive Order 12,898 (Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations)
EPA has determined that the final rule should not have disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects on minority or low-income populations because it increases the level of environmental protection for all affected populations without having any disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects on any population, including any minority or low-income population.