Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration: Current Good Manufacturing Practice in Manufacturing, Packaging, Labeling, or Holding Operations for Dietary Supplements
GAO-07-1057R: Jul 6, 2007
- Full Report:
GAO reviewed the Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) new rule on current good manufacturing practice in manufacturing, packaging, labeling, or holding operations for dietary supplements. GAO found that (1) the final rule establishes the minimum current good manufacturing practice necessary for activities related to manufacturing, packaging, labeling, or holding dietary supplements to ensure the quality of the dietary supplements; and (2) FDA complied with applicable requirements in promulgating the rule.
Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration: Current Good Manufacturing Practice in Manufacturing, Packaging, Labeling, or Holding Operations for Dietary Supplements, GAO-07-1057R, July 6, 2007
Subject: Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration: Current Good Manufacturing Practice in Manufacturing, Packaging, Labeling, or Holding Operations for Dietary Supplements
Pursuant to section 801(a)(2)(A) of title 5, United States Code, this is our report on a major rule promulgated by the Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration (FDA), entitled Current Good Manufacturing Practice in Manufacturing, Packaging, Labeling, or Holding Operations for Dietary Supplements (RIN: 0910-AB88). We received the rule on
The final rule establishes the minimum current good manufacturing practice (CGMP) necessary for activities related to manufacturing, packaging, labeling, or holding dietary supplements to ensure the quality of the dietary supplements. The final rule is effective on
Enclosed is our assessment of the FDA's compliance with the procedural steps required by section 801(a)(1)(B)(i) through (iv) of title 5 with respect to the rule. Our review indicates that FDA complied with the applicable requirements.
If you have any questions about this report, please contact Michael R. Volpe, Assistant General Counsel, at (202) 512-8236. The official responsible for GAO evaluation work relating to the subject matter of the rule is Marjorie Kanof, Managing Director, Health Care. Ms. Kanof can be reached at (202) 512-7114.
Robert J. Cramer
Associate General Counsel
REPORT UNDER 5 U.S.C. sect. 801(a)(2)(A) ON A MAJOR RULE
ISSUED BY THE
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,
FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION
"CURRENT GOOD MANUFACTURING PRACTICE IN
MANUFACTURING, PACKAGING, LABELING, OR
HOLDING OPERATIONS FOR DIETARY SUPPLEMENTS"
(i) Cost-benefit analysis
FDA performed a cost-benefit analysis of the final rule. FDA estimated that, once fully implemented, the quantifiable annual benefits from the final rule will be about $44 million. The benefits able to be quantified are generated by more consistently produced dietary supplements that will increase product safety, which reduces the number of acute illnesses and product recalls. FDA also noted that the final rule may generate benefits that cannot be quantified, such as the reduction in the number of chronic illnesses and conditions. Moreover, FDA estimated that the final rule will cost about $16 million in the first year, $120 million in the second year, and $190 million in the third year. FDA determined that the benefits of the final rule justify the costs.
(ii) Agency actions relevant to the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. sections 603-605, 607, and 609
FDA estimated that the final rule will have a significant economic effect on small businesses. FDA estimated that the final rule will cost, annually, about $46,000 for an establishment with fewer than 20 employees and $184,000 for an establishment with 20-499 employees. For this reason, FDA prepared a Final Regulatory Analysis. The analysis complies with the requirements of the Act, including the steps taken to reduce the economic impact on small entities. For example, FDA provided a longer compliance period for businesses with fewer than 500 employees.
(iii) Agency actions relevant to sections 202-205 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995, 2 U.S.C. sections 1532-1535
FDA's compliance with the Act's documentary requirements regarding costs, benefits, and alternatives considered are contained in FDA's cost-benefit analysis, which was prepared for compliance with Executive Order 12,866. Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 authorizes such use of other analysis for compliance.
(iv) Other relevant information or requirements under acts and executive orders
Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. sections 551 et seq.
FDA promulgated this final rule using the notice and comment procedures found in the Administrative Procedure Act. 5 U.S.C. sect. 553. FDA published an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) in the Federal Register on
Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. sections 3501-3520
The final rule contains information collection requirements that have been submitted for review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) as required by the Act. FDA stated that, prior to the effective date of the final rule, FDA will publish a document in the Federal Register announcing OMB's decision to approve, modify, or disapprove the information collection provisions in the final rule.
Statutory authorization for the rule
The Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act (DSHEA), Pub. L. No. 103-417, was enacted on
Executive Order No. 12,866
The final rule was reviewed by OMB and found to be an economically significant regulatory action under the order.
Executive Order No. 13,132 (Federalism)
FDA concluded that the final rule does not have federalism implications, i.e., FDA determined that the final rule will not have a substantial impact on states, on the relationship between the national government and the states, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.