Skip to main content

Superfund: Better Financial Assurances and More Effective Implementation of Institutional Controls Are Needed to Protect the Public

GAO-06-900T Published: Jun 15, 2006. Publicly Released: Jun 15, 2006.
Jump To:
Skip to Highlights

Highlights

Under the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Superfund program, parties responsible for pollution bear the cost of cleaning it up. However, these parties sometimes no longer exist, leaving the problem for others, typically the federal government, to address. Furthermore, many sites' cleanup remedies leave some waste in place, relying on institutional controls--legal or administrative restrictions on land or water use--to limit the public's exposure. GAO was asked to summarize the findings of its August 2005 report, Environmental Liabilities: EPA Should Do More to Ensure that Liable Parties Meet Their Cleanup Obligations (GAO-05-658) and its January 2005 report, Hazardous Waste Sites: Improved Effectiveness of Controls at Sites Could Better Protect the Public (GAO-05-163). GAO's statement addresses the actions EPA could take to better ensure that parties meet their cleanup obligations and the long-term effectiveness of institutional controls in protecting the public. GAO's reports recommended, among other things, that EPA (1) implement a financial assurance mandate for businesses handling hazardous substances; (2) enhance its oversight and enforcement of existing financial assurances and authorities; (3) ensure that the frequency and scope of monitoring of controls sufficiently maintain their effectiveness; and (4) ensure that information on controls reported in new tracking systems accurately reflects actual conditions.

Full Report

Office of Public Affairs

Topics

Environmental monitoringEnvironmental cleanupsEnvironmental lawHazardous substancesHazardous waste sitesRegulatory agenciesLiability (legal)Waste disposalWaste managementLand managementInternal controlsPollution controlPollution monitoring