Environmental Protection Agency: Inclusion of Delaware and New Jersey in the Clean Air Interstate Rule
GAO-06-726R: May 10, 2006
- Full Report:
GAO reviewed the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) new rule on the inclusion of Delaware and New Jersey in the Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR). GAO found that (1) the final rule includes Delaware and New Jersey in CAIR for fine particles based on EPA's assessment that the states contribute significantly to a downwind state's nonattainment, and (2) EPA complied with the applicable requirements in promulgating the rule.
Environmental Protection Agency: Inclusion of Delaware and New Jersey in the Clean Air Interstate Rule, GAO-06-726R, May 10, 2006
Pursuant to section 801(a)(2)(A) of title 5, United States Code, this is our report on a major rule promulgated by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), entitled Inclusion of Delaware and New Jersey in the Clean Air Interstate Rule (RIN: 2060-AM95). We received the rule on
The final rule includes
Enclosed is our assessment of EPA's compliance with the procedural steps required by section 801(a)(1)(B)(i) through (iv) of title 5 with respect to the rule. Our review indicates that EPA complied with the applicable requirements.
If you have any questions about this report, please contact James W. Vickers, Assistant General Counsel, at (202) 512-8210. The official responsible for GAO evaluation work relating to the subject matter of the rule is Robert Robinson, Managing Director, Natural Resources and Environment. Mr. Robinson can be reached at (202) 512-3841.
Kathleen E. Wannisky
Managing Associate General Counsel
ANALYSIS UNDER 5 U.S.C. sect. 801(a)(1)(B)(i)-(iv) OF A MAJOR RULE
ISSUED BY THE
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
CLEAN AIR INTERSTATE RULE"
(i) Cost-benefit analysis
EPA conducted a cost-benefit analysis of the final rule. EPA estimates the annual private costs to
EPA estimates the benefits attributable to annual SO2 and NOx controls for New Jersey and Delaware will be $630 million of the total annual CAIR program benefits.
(ii) Agency actions relevant to the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. sections 603-605, 607, and 609
The Administrator of EPA has certified that the final rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. EPA states that the final rule does not establish any requirements attributable to small entities but requires
(iii) Agency actions relevant to sections 202-205 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995, 2 U.S.C. sections 1532-1535
While EPA does not reach a final conclusion as to whether the rule will impose a mandate of more than $100 million in any one year on the private sector for the reasons stated above concerning the applicability of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, it has prepared the statement required by the Act.
(iv) Other relevant information or requirements under acts and executive orders
Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. sections 551 et seq.
Instead of the notice and comment procedures in the Administrative Procedure Act, EPA promulgated this rule using the procedures, which have similar notice and comment procedures, contained in section 307(d) of the Clean Air Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 7607(d). The use of these procedures regarding this rule is mandated by section 307(d)(1)(B) of the Clean Air Act. 42 U.S.C. 7607(d)(1)(K).
Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. sections 3501-3520
The final rule contains an information collection that is subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act. EPA has submitted the required information to OMB including the estimated burden. EPA estimates the burden to be $263,000, which includes installing and operating the emissions monitoring equipment and reporting the results.
Statutory authorization for the rule
The final rule is promulgated under the authority found at 23 U.S.C. 101 and 42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q.
Executive Order No. 12866
The final rule was reviewed by OMB and found to be an economically significant regulatory action under the order.
Executive Order No. 13132 (Federalism)
EPA states that the final rule does not have federalism implications under the order.