Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration: Occupational Exposure to Hexavalent Chromium
GAO-06-539R: Mar 27, 2006
- Full Report:
GAO reviewed the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's (OSHA) new rule on subject occupational exposure to hexavalent chromium. GAO found that (1) the rule establishes an 8-hour time-weighted average exposure limit of 5 micrograms of Cr(VI) per cubic meter of air; and (2) OSHA complied with applicable requirements in promulgating the rule.
Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration: Occupational Exposure to Hexavalent Chromium, GAO-06-539R, March 27, 2006
Pursuant to section 801(a)(2)(A) of title 5, United States Code, this is our report on a major rule promulgated by the Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), entitled Occupational Exposure to Hexavalent Chromium (RIN: 1218-AB45). We received the rule on
The final rule amends the existing standard which limits occupational exposure to hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI)). The final rule establishes an 8-hour time-weighted average exposure limit of 5 micrograms of Cr(VI) per cubic meter of air.
Enclosed is our assessment of OSHA's compliance with the procedural steps required by section 801(a)(1)(B)(i) through (iv) of title 5 with respect to the rule. Our review indicates that OSHA complied with the applicable requirements.
If you have any questions about this report, please contact James W. Vickers, Assistant General Counsel, at (202) 512-8210.
Kathleen E. Wannisky
Managing Associate General Counsel
Acting Director, OSHA Directorate of
Standards and Guidance
Department of Labor
ANALYSIS UNDER 5 U.S.C. sect. 801(a)(1)(B)(i)-(iv) OF A MAJOR RULE
ISSUED BY THE
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
"OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE TO HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM"
(i) Cost-benefit analysis
OSHA estimates that the final rule will require employers to incur costs of $282 million per year and $110 million per year to comply with the personal protective equipment and hygiene requirements already present in existing standards.
OSHA estimates that the final rule will prevent 1,782 to 6,546 lung cancers over the working lifetime of the current worker populations.
(ii) Agency actions relevant to the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. sections 603-605, 607, and 609
OSHA prepared a Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis in connection with the final rule that complies with the requirements of the Act. The analysis also discusses the alternatives considered to reduce the burden on small entities, including certain exemptions and special approaches for shipyard and construction industries.
(iii) Agency actions relevant to sections 202-205 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995, 2 U.S.C. sections 1532-1535
The final rule contains a mandate for the private sector of about $288 million each year, as described in title II of the Act.
(iv) Other relevant information or requirements under acts and executive orders
Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. sections 551 et seq.
The final rule was issued using the notice and comment procedures found at 5 U.S.C. 553. On
Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. sections 3501-3520
The final rule contains new information collections that are subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act. OSHA estimates the total burden to be 940,000 hours at a cost of $126 million.
Statutory authorization for the rule
The final rule is promulgated under the authority found in sections 4, 6(b), 8(c), and 8(g) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (29 U.S.C. 653, 655, 657); section 107 of the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act (40 U.S.C. 333); and section 41, the Longshore and Harbor Worker's Compensation Act (33 U.S.C. 941).
Executive Order No. 12866
The final rule was reviewed by OMB and found to be an economically significant regulatory action under the order.
Executive Order No. 13132 (Federalism)
OSHA has reviewed the final rule under the order and found that the final rule will fall under the preemption provisions of the Occupational Safety and Health Act and will preempt state rules that do not have OSHA-approved plans.