Department of Defense: Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement; Radio Frequency Identification
GAO-05-1040R: Sep 23, 2005
- Full Report:
GAO reviewed the Department of Defense's (DOD) new rule on radio frequency identification. GAO found that (1) the final rule amends the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement by adding policy pertaining to package marking with passive radio frequency identification (RFID) tags, and the rule also requires contractors to affix passive RFID tags at the case and palletized unit load levels when shipping packaged operational rations, clothing, individual equipment, tools, personal demand items, or weapon system repair parts to the Defense Distribution Depot in Susquehanna, Pennsylvania or in San Joaquin, California; and (2) DOD complied with applicable requirements in promulgating the rule.
Department of Defense: Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement; Radio Frequency Identification, GAO-05-1040R, September 23, 2005
Pursuant to section 801(a)(2)(A) of title 5, United States Code, this is our report on a major rule promulgated by the Department of Defense (DoD), entitled Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement; Radio Frequency Identification (DFARS Case 2004-DO11). We received the rule on
The final rule amends the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement by adding policy pertaining to package marking with passive radio frequency identification (RFID) tags. The rule requires contractors to affix passive RFID tags at the case and palletized unit load levels when shipping packaged operational rations, clothing, individual equipment, tools, personal demand items, or weapon system repair parts to the Defense Distribution Depot in Susquehanna, Pennsylvania, or in San Joaquin, California.
Enclosed is our assessment of the DoD's compliance with the procedural steps required by section 801(a)(1)(B)(i) through (iv) of title 5 with respect to the rule. Our review indicates that DoD complied with the applicable requirements.
If you have any questions about this report, please contact James W. Vickers, Assistant General Counsel, at (202) 512-8210. The official responsible for GAO evaluation work relating to the subject matter of the rule is Henry Hinton, Managing Director, Defense Capabilities and Management. Mr. Hinton can be reached at (202) 512-4300.
Kathleen E. Wannisky
Managing Associate General Counsel
ANALYSIS UNDER 5 U.S.C. sect. 801(a)(1)(B)(i)-(iv) OF A MAJOR RULE
ISSUED BY THE
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
"DEFENSE FEDERAL ACQUISITION REGULATION SUPPLEMENT;
RADIO FREQUENCY IDENTIFICATION"
(DFARS CASE 2004-DO11)
(i) Cost-benefit analysis
DoD's cost-benefit analysis for the selected alternative (Passive RFID with DoD involvement according to a phased implementation plan) shows a per shipment cost increase of $11 in years one and two and a per case cost increase of $.53. For 25,000 shipments in year two, the total cost increase would be $262,500.
The benefits include reduced shipping costs, reduced inventory loss, reduced duplicate orders, and reduced labor expenses. The optimistic view of the net savings is $1,781 million over 6 years and the pessimistic view of the net savings is $69.9 million over the same time period.
(ii) Agency actions relevant to the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. sections 603-605, 607, and 609
DoD prepared an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis in connection with the proposed rule and a Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis for the final rule. These analyses comply with the requirements of the Act including a discussion of the three alternatives considered and the impacts of each on small entities.
(iii) Agency actions relevant to sections 202-205 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995, 2 U.S.C. sections 1532-1535
The final rule does not contain either an intergovernmental or private sector mandate, as defined in title II, of more than $100 million in any one year.
(iv) Other relevant information or requirements under acts and executive orders
Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. sections 551 et seq.
The final rule was issued using the notice and comment procedures found at 5 U.S.C. 553. On
Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. sections 3501-3520
The final rule contains a new information collection requirement that is subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act. The collection has been approved for use through
Statutory authorization for the rule
The final rule is promulgated under the authority found at 41 U.S.C. 421 and 48 CFR Chapter 1.
Executive Order No. 12866
The final rule was reviewed by OMB and found to be an economically significant regulatory action under the order.