Medical Malpractice Insurance:
Multiple Factors Have Contributed to Increased Premium Rates
GAO-03-702, Jun 27, 2003
Over the past several years, large increases in medical malpractice insurance premium rates have raised concerns that physicians will no longer be able to afford malpractice insurance and will be forced to curtail or discontinue providing certain services. Additionally, a lack of profitability has led some large insurers to stop selling medical malpractice insurance, furthering concerns that physicians will not be able to obtain coverage. To help Congress better understand the reasons behind the rate increases, GAO undertook a study to (1) describe the extent of the increases in medical malpractice insurance rates, (2) analyze the factors that contributed to those increases, and (3) identify changes in the medical malpractice insurance market that might make this period of rising premium rates different from previous such periods.
Since 1999, medical malpractice premium rates have increased dramatically for physicians in some specialties in a number of states. However, among larger insurers in the seven states GAO analyzed, both the premium rates and the extent to which these rates have increased varied greatly. Multiple factors, including falling investment income and rising reinsurance costs, have contributed to recent increases in premium rates in our sample states. However, GAO found that losses on medical malpractice claims--which make up the largest part of insurers' costs--appear to be the primary driver of rate increases in the long run. And while losses for the entire industry have shown a persistent upward trend, insurers' loss experiences have varied dramatically across our sample states, resulting in wide variations in premium rates. In addition, factors other than losses can affect premium rates in the short run, exacerbating cycles within the medical malpractice market. For example, high investment income or adjustments to account for lower than expected losses may legitimately permit insurers to price insurance below the expected cost of paying claims. However, because of the long lag between collecting premiums and paying claims, underlying losses may be increasing while insurers are holding premium rates down, requiring large premium rate hikes when the increasing trend in losses is recognized. While these factors may explain some events in the medical malpractice market, GAO could not fully analyze the composition and causes of losses at the insurer level owing to a lack of comprehensive data. GAO's analysis also showed that the medical malpractice market has changed considerably since previous hard markets. Physician-owned and/or operated insurers now cover around 60 percent of the market, self-insurance has become more widespread, and states have passed laws designed to reduce premium rates. As a result, it is not clear how premium rates might behave during future soft or hard markets.
- Review Pending
- Closed - implemented
- Closed - not implemented
Matter for Congressional Consideration
Matter: Health care providers have suffered through three medical malpractice insurance "crisis" in the past 30 years. Each instance has generatede competing claims about the extent of the problem, the causes, and the possible solutions. In each instance, a lack of necessary data has hindered and continues to hinder the efforts of Congress, state regulators, and others to carefully analyze the problem and the effectiveness of the solutions that have been tried. Because of the potential for future crisis, and in order to facilitate the evaluation of legislative remedies put in place by various levels of government, Congress may want to consider taking steps to ensure that additional and better data are collected. Specifically, Congress may want to consider encouraging NAIC and state insurance regulators to identify the types of data that are necessary to properly evaluate the medical malpractice insurance market--specifically, the frequency, severity, and causes of losses--and begin collecting these data in a form that would allow appropriate analysis. Included in this process would be an analysis of the costs and benefits of collecting such data, as well as the extent to which some segments of this market are not captured by current data-gathering efforts. Such data could serve the interests of state and federal governments and allow both to better understand the causes of recurring crises in the medical malpractice insurance market and formulate the most appropriate and effective solutions.
Status: Closed - Not Implemented
Comments: According to NAIC officials, Congress has taken no action with respect to this matter for congressional consideration.