Community Investment:

Los Angeles's Use of a Community Development Block Grant Exemption

GAO-02-726R: Published: Jun 28, 2002. Publicly Released: Jun 28, 2002.

Additional Materials:

Contact:

Richard J. Hillman
(202) 512-8678
contact@gao.gov

 

Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800
youngc1@gao.gov

Under the Department of Housing and Urban Development's (HUD) Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program, entitlement communities--also called grantees--receive funds that they can spend to support specific community development activities, such as rehabilitating housing, improving public facilities, and providing public services. Most grantees are prohibited by statute from spending more than 15 percent of their CDBG funding on public service activities, such as child care, health care, and crime prevention. However, in the aftermath of the 1992 Los Angeles civil unrest, Congress gave an exemption from this statutory cap to two grantees--the City of Los Angeles and the County of Los Angeles--allowing them to spend up to 25 percent of their funds on public services. In December 2001, the exemption was extended through 2003. Between 1993 and 2001, the City of Los Angeles spent between 20 and 25 percent of its CDBG funding to support public service activities, while the County of Los Angeles spent between 9 and 20 percent. According to HUD data for 1999 through 2001, the city and county used a majority of their public service funding to support general public services and either youth or senior services. There is no statutory or regulatory requirement that the grantees develop plans to transition to the 15 percent cap; however, HUD suggested in 1999 that the grantees develop such plans. As of May 2002, the City and the County of Los Angeles have undertaken some preliminary steps to facilitate a transition, but they do not have locally approved transition plans to decrease public service spending after 2003 in order to comply with the 15 percent spending cap.

Status Legend:

More Info
  • Review Pending-GAO has not yet assessed implementation status.
  • Open-Actions to satisfy the intent of the recommendation have not been taken or are being planned, or actions that partially satisfy the intent of the recommendation have been taken.
  • Closed-implemented-Actions that satisfy the intent of the recommendation have been taken.
  • Closed-not implemented-While the intent of the recommendation has not been satisfied, time or circumstances have rendered the recommendation invalid.
    • Review Pending
    • Open
    • Closed - implemented
    • Closed - not implemented

    Recommendation for Executive Action

    Recommendation: To help ensure a smooth transition in the event that the 25 percent public service cap is not extended, the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development should request that officials from the City and the County of Los Angeles submit locally approved plans to reduce their public service spending in the 2004 local fiscal year to the lower, 15 percent statutory cap.

    Agency Affected: Department of Housing and Urban Development

    Status: Closed - Implemented

    Comments: As GAO recommended, HUD sent letters to the City of Los Angeles and the County of Los Angeles in August 2002, requesting that each jurisdiction develop and adopt a transition plan to reduce their CDBG public service spending to the 15 percent statutory cap, and submit the approved plan to HUD. If either jurisdiction elected not to develop a transition plan, HUD requested that they submit their determination and the reasoning for such determination to HUD. The City and County of Los Angeles elected not to submit a transition plan and provided this determination to HUD.

    Jul 29, 2014

    Jun 6, 2014

    May 14, 2014

    May 9, 2014

    Feb 6, 2014

    Jan 22, 2014

    Jan 15, 2014

    Sep 18, 2013

    Aug 26, 2013

    Looking for more? Browse all our products here