Budget and Spending:

TVA Needs To Develop a Formal Process for Determining Whether To Construct Projects In-House or by Private Contractor

EMD-82-49: Published: Mar 15, 1982. Publicly Released: Mar 15, 1982.

Contact:

John W. Sprague
(202) 512-7783
contact@gao.gov

 

Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800
youngc1@gao.gov

GAO was asked to examine the policies used by the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) in determining whether to contract for construction or to perform the construction in-house. GAO was asked to determine: (1) whether TVA has a policy whereby the costs of using its own employees versus the costs of using private contractors for construction projects are compared; (2) if TVA has such a policy, whether it is used on all projects, what criteria are used to determine the least costly approach, and if they are reasonable; (3) how TVA calculates overhead, if administrative costs are included in comparisons, and how this cost allocation compares with private industry or other Government construction projects; and (4) what factors TVA should consider in developing a method for comparing costs.

GAO found that, while TVA has historically used in-house staff for most of its design and construction work, it does not have a procedure for comparing the cost of building a project using its employees to the cost of using a private contractor. TVA does not have a policy requiring comparisons to be routinely made and does not believe it is subject to regulations requiring such comparisons. TVA officials stated that unwritten factors are routinely considered in the decisionmaking process and that overhead costs are not included in most partial project or subproject estimates. GAO added overhead costs to the comparisons and found that they were insignificant; however, these omissions indicated that standard estimating procedures are needed. Evaluation of some of the cost comparisons performed by TVA did not show that construction by contract is more economical in general than in-house construction.

Status Legend:

More Info
  • Review Pending-GAO has not yet assessed implementation status.
  • Open-Actions to satisfy the intent of the recommendation have not been taken or are being planned, or actions that partially satisfy the intent of the recommendation have been taken.
  • Closed-implemented-Actions that satisfy the intent of the recommendation have been taken.
  • Closed-not implemented-While the intent of the recommendation has not been satisfied, time or circumstances have rendered the recommendation invalid.
    • Review Pending
    • Open
    • Closed - implemented
    • Closed - not implemented

    Recommendation for Executive Action

    Recommendation: The Chairman of the Board of Directors, TVA, should develop detailed implementation procedures and criteria for cost comparisons. These procedures should ensure consistent cost comparisons and well-documented decisions. The criteria that are developed should provide for cost comparisons which include the same scope and level of performance, the same cost factors, and all costs, including indirect overhead.

    Agency Affected: Tennessee Valley Authority

    Status: Closed - Not Implemented

    Comments: While there is still some relevancy to this recommendation, future monitoring of actions taken will be through RCED-83-123.

    Jul 18, 2014

    Jun 23, 2014

    Jun 17, 2014

    Jun 12, 2014

    Jun 10, 2014

    May 28, 2014

    Mar 27, 2014

    Mar 6, 2014

    Feb 20, 2014

    Looking for more? Browse all our products here