Skip to main content

GAO's Response to DOE's Comments on EMD-81-108, "Better Oversight Needed at DOE's Nuclear Facilities"

EMD-82-36 Published: Jan 27, 1982. Publicly Released: Feb 11, 1982.
Jump To:
Skip to Highlights

Highlights

GAO responded to Department of Energy (DOE) criticisms of report EMD-81-108 in which GAO recommended major changes in the safety and health oversight program at DOE contractor-operated facilities. GAO suggested that Congress consider legislation to require the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to review the safety of a number of facilities, including several defense-related activities. DOE criticized the report on the grounds that: (1) GAO misunderstood the DOE approach to safety and health; (2) NRC lacks technical expertise in technology associated with DOE production nuclear reactors and operations; (3) the high cost of a review and evaluation by NRC would not provide a commensurate benefit; and (4) NRC oversight of this facet of DOE defense responsibilities could seriously interfere with national security.

Full Report

Office of Public Affairs

Topics

Independent regulatory commissionsLegislationMonitoringNational defense operationsNuclear facility safetyOccupational health standardsProgram evaluationSafety regulationNuclear facilitiesHealth care