New Means of Analysis Required for Policy Decisions Affecting Private Forestry Sector
EMD-81-18: Published: Jan 21, 1981. Publicly Released: Jan 21, 1981.
- Full Report:
GAO examined the relationship of federal capital gains tax treatment to overall timber production and reforestation by the private sector and the production potential of nonindustrial private forest lands. The forest industry has long contended that the timber capital gains tax provision has encouraged reforestation of the Nation's private forests. However, the tax law does not require that capital gains benefits be applied to reforesting or improving management techniques. Tax benefits are based on income from timber cut rather than on what the taxpayer spends for site establishment, reforestation, and timber management.
Those cutting and selling timber from public forests may well be realizing capital gains benefits without contributing to long-term investments in the land or replacement stands. No source GAO contacted could provide firm evidence to support this claim. The lack of alignment between actual timber production and distribution of capital gains benefits suggests that Congress needs much better information to evaluate the effectiveness of existing tax policy. Significant tax expenditures are being made in conjunction with federal timber sales with no real understanding as to their distributive effect. Significantly different analytical techniques, including a private sector forestry policy model or analytical framework, must be adopted to resolve these issues. There is no adequate estimate of potential timber production on privately owned land. It is likely that only a fraction of that acreage could be managed for increased timber production. Future assessments should take into account the identification of economically and biologically productive acreage, production of timber within a reasonable distance of existing or potential markets, and whether the owner's objectives support increased timber production. Congress has authorized and is considering federal assistance for site establishment and reforestation expenses. Better cooperation is needed among organizations that provide forestry assistance.
Matter for Congressional Consideration
Comments: GAO has no information on the actions taken by the agency.
Matter: Congress should support the expanded analytical capabilities which GAO called for in its recommendations to the Secretary of Agriculture.
Recommendation for Executive Action
Comments: Please call 202/512-6100 for additional information.
Recommendation: The Secretary of Agriculture should take the initiative through the Forest Service to develop a new analytical framework and expand its analytical capability to deal with tax policy, financial and technical assistance, and related considerations as they affect, especially, the performance of the timber industry in the private sector. In striving to develop this capability, GAO urges the Forest Service to take full advantage of the expertise of the Department of the Treasury, particularly in analyzing tax policy options and to elicit, to the fullest possible degree, active collaboration of the private sector.
Agency Affected: Department of Agriculture