Before Licensing Floating Nuclear Power Plants, Many Answers Are Needed

EMD-78-36: Published: Sep 13, 1978. Publicly Released: Sep 13, 1978.

Additional Materials:

Contact:

Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800
youngc1@gao.gov

The predecessor to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) received an application in 1973 to manufacture eight standardized floating nuclear power plants near Jacksonville, Florida, and received a separate application in 1974 to station two of the eight plants off the New Jersey coast. Because the floating plants will be built at a location other than where they will be operated, NRC issued new regulations requiring a license for the manufacture of the plants. Approximately $300 million has been spent by the applicants on activities related to the applications, and the first application is more than 3 years behind its original licensing schedule.

NRC staff has made several management decisions that have complicated and contributed to the 3-year delay in its review of the application to manufacture floating nuclear power plants. Factors inhibiting the licensing review process incude: (1) preparation of a generic environmental statement which adds little to the licensing process; (2) NRC failure to evaluate siting possibilities in a timely manner; and (3) NRC failure to evaluate a reactor core melt in a timely manner. The following questions concerning floating nuclear power plants remain: (1) whether more information needed on the risks of a core-melt accident; (2) whether the site will meet requirements for a floating nuclear plant; (3) whether the weight of the plant represent a problem; (4) whether methods been developed for the handling and recovery of nuclear fuel and radioactive waste; (5) whether a method has been developed for decommissioning the floating plant; and (6) whether a floating plant will minimize the environmental effect of power plant operation.

Recommendation for Executive Action

  1. Status: Closed

    Comments: Please call 202/512-6100 for additional information.

    Recommendation: Before concluding its review of the manufacturing license, the Chairman, NRC, should: (1) establish an acceptable level of risk for a core-melt accident on a floating nuclear plant; (2) identify those changes which must be made to the design to achieve that level of risk; and (3) require that weight parameters be developed for the safe operation of the power plant. Before concluding its review of a license to operate the plants, the Chairman should: (1) identify specific methods of handling the loading and offloading of radioactive material; (2) require specific procedures for mitigating the consequences of a core-melt accident; (3) require that a specific decommissioning plan be prepared for the floating plant and the breakwater, including a funding mechanism to ensure that the facility owner pays the costs of decommissioning; and (4) reanalyze the effect of the power plant on tourism.

    Agency Affected:

 

Explore the full database of GAO's Open Recommendations »

Sep 14, 2016

Sep 8, 2016

Aug 11, 2016

Aug 9, 2016

Aug 4, 2016

Jul 15, 2016

Jul 14, 2016

Jun 20, 2016

Mar 3, 2016

Looking for more? Browse all our products here