Budget and Spending:

Congressional Guidance Needed on Federal Cost Share of Water Resource Projects When Project Benefits Are Not Widespread

CED-81-12: Published: Nov 13, 1980. Publicly Released: Nov 13, 1980.

Contact:

Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800
youngc1@gao.gov

Many water resource projects provide benefits to large segments of the country; however, the Corps of Engineers (CE) and the Soil Conservation Service (SCS) have built some projects that primarily benefit only a few landowners or businesses.

GAO found that for CE and SCS projects, the non-Federal entity was seldom required to share a larger portion of project cost to compensate for the special benefits, such as land enhancement or increased local taxes. Local sponsors provide land easements, rights-of-way, and utility relocations for most projects. In feasibility studies, the estimated costs of the items are shown as the non-Federal cost share. However, GAO found that the estimated non-Federal cost share in the studies by SCS usually contain extraneous cost items which were not genuine project costs. This inflated the total project cost and also made the non-Federal share appear much higher than it actually was. Land treatment represents 55 percent of the total non-Federal share for all the projects approved by SCS through September 1979. GAO believes land treatment is important and should be strongly encouraged. However, it is misleading to include the estimated cost along with other cost items because: (1) land treatment is the individual landowner's responsibility; (2) land treatment is strictly voluntary and SCS has little or no control over implementing recommended treatment; (3) SCS does not effectively monitor or follow up on whether the measures are applied, and if so, at what cost; and (4) SCS does not include land treatment measures when estimating each project's benefit/cost ratio.

Status Legend:

More Info
  • Review Pending-GAO has not yet assessed implementation status.
  • Open-Actions to satisfy the intent of the recommendation have not been taken or are being planned, or actions that partially satisfy the intent of the recommendation have been taken.
  • Closed-implemented-Actions that satisfy the intent of the recommendation have been taken.
  • Closed-not implemented-While the intent of the recommendation has not been satisfied, time or circumstances have rendered the recommendation invalid.
    • Review Pending
    • Open
    • Closed - implemented
    • Closed - not implemented

    Matter for Congressional Consideration

    Matter: Congress should clarify its intent regarding cost sharing for future water resource projects which provide significant special local benefits and give additional guidance to the Federal agencies involved in water resource development concerning the projects.

    Status: Closed

    Comments: Please call 202/512-6100 for additional information.

    Recommendation for Executive Action

    Recommendation: The Secretary of Agriculture should direct the Administrator of SCS to stop including ongoing land treatment measures as part of the estimated project cost and non-Federal share in SCS feasibility studies. The estimated land treatment costs should be itemized but shown separately on a different schedule.

    Agency Affected: Department of Agriculture

    Status: Closed

    Comments: Please call 202/512-6100 for additional information.

    Mar 27, 2014

    Mar 6, 2014

    Feb 20, 2014

    Jan 24, 2014

    Oct 29, 2013

    Sep 30, 2013

    Sep 26, 2013

    Jul 29, 2013

    Jul 24, 2013

    Jul 10, 2013

    Looking for more? Browse all our products here