Developing a National Airport System:

Additional Congressional Guidance Needed

CED-79-17: Published: Apr 17, 1979. Publicly Released: Apr 17, 1979.

Additional Materials:

Contact:

Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800
youngc1@gao.gov

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) issued a national airport system plan which showed that over $10 billion will be needed in the next decade to improve 3,100 of the nation's airports and to build almost 500 new ones. The national plan includes about $2.9 billion to improve some 2,600 general aviation airports. FAA defined general aviation airports having significant national interest as those with 10 based aircraft and situated 30 minutes from another airport in the national plan. This definition was to provide as many citizens as possible with reasonable access to a safe and adequate airport.

Using this definition, FAA reduced by about 400 the number of general aviation airports included in the 1978 national plan as compared to the old national plan. However, this reduction may not have been as large as Congress intended. An additional 500 general aviation airports could have been eliminated had FAA used 20 based aircraft in its definition of significant national interest. FAA recognizes the importance of airport planning and has developed basic planning guidelines. However, airport master plans are not required as a condition for Federal airport development grants. Improvements in FAA planning and guidelines are needed to focus greater attention on the merits of regional airports and to assure that airport noise problems are adequately considered and plans are fully coordinated with state and local interests. Airport development grants are adequate to cover only half of the needs. Under current legislation, FAA was not been able to carry out the national plan or assure that important airport needs, such as safety, were met.

Matter for Congressional Consideration

  1. Status: Closed

    Comments: Please call 202/512-6100 for additional information.

    Matter: Congress should review the FAA definition to determine its acceptability. If unacceptable, Congress should incorporate an acceptable definition in the authorizing legislation. Congress should: (1) require airports to have an approved master plan and be included in an acceptable state or regional system plan as a condition for eligibility to receive federal airport development grants; (2) determine whether funding will be sufficient to pay for a higher level of planning; and (3) require future provisions in the national plan to be based on FAA approved or acceptable state-local airport plans. In addition, Congress should establish priorites to distribute airport development grants.

 

Explore the full database of GAO's Open Recommendations »

Sep 14, 2016

Sep 2, 2016

Aug 8, 2016

Jul 28, 2016

Jul 13, 2016

Jul 7, 2016

Jun 24, 2016

Jun 21, 2016

May 26, 2016

Looking for more? Browse all our products here