Skip to main content

Should Amtrak Develop High-Speed Corridor Service Outside the Northeast?

CED-78-67 Published: Apr 05, 1978. Publicly Released: Apr 05, 1978.
Jump To:
Skip to Highlights

Highlights

If the National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak) were to extend its northeast corridor to 16 other corridors, the following would be anticipated: (1) improved and more convenient services to the public through greater train speed and better on-time performance; (2) lower deficits through increased ridership; (3) improved energy conservation through the public's greater use of the energy-efficient train; (4) lower air pollution as fewer people use their automobiles; (5) employment resulting from the labor-intensive railroad operation; (6) preservation of some railroad rights-of-way in and between urban areas; and (7) maintenance of a mode of transportation that can be converted away from oil in a crisis. Congress must decide whether these possible benefits justify the high cost associated with establishing and maintaining corridor rail service.

Full Report

Office of Public Affairs

Topics

Air pollutionEnergy conservationFederal aid to railroadsRailroad transportation operationsSubsidiesTransportation costsTransportation researchRailGovernment subsidiesBudget deficit