[Protest of Navy Contract Award for Central Processor Units and Right-to-Use Licenses]

B-272336,B-272336.2: Sep 27, 1996

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

A firm protested a Navy contract award for central processor units and right-to-use licenses, contending that the: (1) Navy improperly opened discussions with the awardee after initially making award to the protester; (2) awardee's alternate proposal on which the award was based was unacceptable; and (3) Navy should have held discussions with all competitive range bidders and requested best-and-final (BAFO) offers from all bidders. GAO held that the: (1) Navy held post-award discussions with the awardee to provide it an opportunity to modify its bid and clarify information for determining its alternate bid's acceptability; (2) Navy should have held discussions with all the competitive range bidders and requested BAFO; and (3) protester was prejudiced by the Navy's actions, since the award outcome might have been different if the protester had a chance to modify its bid. Accordingly, the protest was sustained, and GAO recommended that the Navy: (1) hold discussions with the protester and the awardee and request BAFO; (2) terminate the awardee's contract if the protester offers the lowest price and make award to the protester; and (3) reimburse the protester for its protest costs.

Oct 18, 2017

Oct 17, 2017

Oct 13, 2017

Oct 12, 2017

Oct 11, 2017

  • Daekee Global Company, Ltd.
    We dismiss the protest because the protester has not established that it is an interested party.

Oct 10, 2017

Looking for more? Browse all our products here