[Protest of State Contract Award for Uniformed Armed and Unarmed Guard Services]

B-271385.4,B-271385.5,B-271385.6,B-271385.7,B-271385.8: Sep 23, 1996

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

Two firms protested a Department of State contract award for uniformed armed and unarmed guard services, contending that: (1) State improperly evaluated the awardee's technical proposal; (2) the awardee's proposal should have been rejected as mathematically unbalanced; and (3) State failed to adequately analyze the awardee's low bid price. GAO held that: (1) the evaluation of the awardee's bid was reasonable and consistent with the evaluation criteria; (2) the awardee's bid was not mathematically unbalanced, since it reflected the government's anticipated requirements and would result in the lowest overall cost to the government; (3) State did not evaluate the realism of the awardee's price, since the contract placed upon the contractor the risk and responsibility for loss; and (4) State's analysis of the awardee's bid price was reasonable, since it compared the awardee's price with the other bid prices received and performed a crosswalk analysis to ensure that the awardee's proposed methodology for meeting certain technical requirements was supported by its proposed price. Accordingly, the protests were denied.

Oct 19, 2017

Oct 18, 2017

Oct 17, 2017

Oct 13, 2017

Looking for more? Browse all our products here