[Protest of Army Contract Award for Guidewall Construction]

B-258205: Dec 20, 1994

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

A firm protested an Army contract award for waterway guidewall construction, contending that the Army: (1) improperly determined that the awardee's bid was responsive; and (2) mistakenly assumed that the Buy American Act did not apply to the procurement. GAO held that the: (1) protester's contention that the Army considered the Act inapplicable was based solely on the inaccurate statement of an unauthorized Army employee; (2) protester failed to provide a valid basis of protest; and (3) protester untimely filed after bid opening its protest of alleged solicitation improprieties. Accordingly, the protest was dismissed.

Oct 17, 2017

Oct 13, 2017

Oct 12, 2017

Oct 11, 2017

  • Daekee Global Company, Ltd.
    We dismiss the protest because the protester has not established that it is an interested party.

Oct 10, 2017

Oct 6, 2017

Oct 5, 2017

Looking for more? Browse all our products here